Physicians Should Factor Race, Ethnicity and Much More When Making Treatment Decisions in Contralateral Breast Cancer, Says Expert

Video

The presence of several risk factors—such as age, race and mutation status—for contralateral breast cancer must be considered when making treatment decisions, according to an expert from the Mayo Clinic.

During the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), CancerNetwork® spoke with Siddhartha Yadav, MD, MBBS, a medical oncologist and assistant professor of Medicine and Oncology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, about his key takeaways on findings from the population-based prospective CARRIERS study assessing germline pathogenic variants and other factors as risks for contralateral breast cancer.

In his presentation on findings from the study, Yadav indicated that age and menopausal status were factors that had a significant influence on the risk of contralateral breast cancer harboring germline genetic mutation. According to Yadav, these findings are important for decision-making on contralateral breast cancer risk-management strategies such as the use of prophylactic mastectomy.

Yadav also detailed other key findings concerning contralateral breast cancer risks related to factors such as specific germline pathogenic variants as well as race and ethnicity.

Transcript:

The key takeaway points from my presentation are that: number 1, BRCA1 and BRCA2 in population-based studies [demonstrate] similar risk as we were aware in the past, so it has not changed our management. Number 2 is we are increasingly observing, not just in our study but other studies as well, that ATM carriers may not have an elevated risk of contralateral breast cancer. Number 3 is CHEK2 behaves very differently than ATM, where [patients with CHEK2 mutations] may be at an approximately two-fold increased risk of contralateral breast cancer.

We also looked at race and ethnicity. Black women who are BRCA1/2 carriers should be managed similarly to White women who are BRCA1/2 carriers, because we saw that the risk estimates were fairly similar. And finally, what we found was that a diagnosis of first breast cancer, [estrogen receptor] status of first breast cancer and the menopausal status of first breast cancer significantly influenced your risk of developing second or contralateral breast cancer. When discussing risk-management strategies for contralateral breast cancer, all of these factors should be incorporated in the clinical decision-making process.

Reference

Yadav S, Boddicker NJ, Na J, et al. Population-based estimates of contralateral breast cancer risk among carriers of germline pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. Presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS4-04.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content