Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology Brothers
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Burnout: Which Way Out?

April 25, 2023
By Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA
Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 37, Issue 4
Volume 37
Issue 4
Pages: 161

Co-editor-in-Chief Julie M. Vose, MD, MBA, writes about the effects and prevalence of burnout amongst oncologists and reviews strategies to address the issue.

Burnout and the related morale injury it causes are characterized by physical and/or emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased effectiveness. Burnout is all too common in physicians and is estimated to affect at least 50% of physicians at some point in their career.1 Many systemic risk factors contribute to this epidemic, including high patient volumes, increased administrative burden, lack of “user-friendly” electronic medical records, and lack of organizational infrastructure. Personal risk factors include being female, not having a spouse or partner, and being of younger age.

Oncologists are particularly at risk for burnout due to the difficult patient population we treat, continuous exposure to life-threatening illnesses, and psychological distress.

By now we can all identify burnout and stress. The more important question is what to do about it. Physician wellness starts with us: getting the rest we need, eating a healthy diet, exercising, doing activities that are not work related, and identifying and reducing unnecessary stress. The harder part is, how can we get the health care system to recognize stress in physicians and work with us on modifications to decrease the stress and burnout?

There is only so much any 1 physician can do on their own to reduce stress without infrastructure modifications. Research comparing the effectiveness of individual vs organizational interventions suggests that institutional interventions are much more effective than individual approaches alone, but both approaches when used together are the most effective in reducing burnout.2

How can health care professionals improve the systemic infrastructure that contributes to burnout? We need to work with the health care organization to build system-level interventions aimed at reducing environmental stressors and improve the workplace infrastructure support. One example of a program with such a design is the University of Colorado APEX (Awesome Patient Experience) teamwork model, which incorporates medical assistants to decrease administrative burdens on providers. After this system was implemented, the physician burnout rate was reduced from 53% to 13%.3

In addition, a thorough evaluation of the necessity of all online learning modules and excess meetings and committees and a reevaluation of patient volumes per provider are needed to move toward the future. Another example of an available program to help institutions is the American Medical Association STEPS Forward.4 This program recommends 9 strategies—engagement of leadership, acknowledgment and routine of longitudinal burnout assessments, creation of infrastructure for implementation of individual and system-level interventions, workflow efficiency, reduction in administrative burdens, support for the health of the workforce, strengthening of local leadership, tracking organizational costs of burnout, and routine assessment of interventions—to promote organizational health and employee well-being.

The most important aspect of improving burnout is for physicians to work with the administrative and health care teams and to advocate for themselves. Medicine is a team sport, and all the players need to work together for the same goal.

REFERENCES

  1. Shanafelt TD, West CP, Sinsky C, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2017. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(9):1681-1694. doi:10.1016/j. mayocp.2018.10.023
  2. Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):195-205. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2016.7674
  3. Wright AA, Katz IT. Beyond burnout - redesigning care to restore meaning and sanity for physicians. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):309-311. doi:10.1056/ NEJMp1716845
  4. Redesign your practice: reignite your purpose. AMA Ed Hub. STEPS Forward. Accessed March 17, 2023. https://bit.ly/3YQq4z2
Download Issue PDFDownload PDF
Articles in this issue

Emerging Strategies to Manage Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Emerging Strategies to Manage Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Advancement Continues in ‘Go-to’ Strategies for Gynecologic Cancer
Advancement Continues in ‘Go-to’ Strategies for Gynecologic Cancer
Circulating Tumor DNA as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Outcomes With Margetuximab and Pembrolizumab in Pretreated HER2-Positive Gastric/ Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Circulating Tumor DNA as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Outcomes With Margetuximab and Pembrolizumab in Pretreated HER2-Positive Gastric/ Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
The Management of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
The Management of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Burnout: Which Way Out?
Burnout: Which Way Out?
Recent Videos
Related Content
Advertisement

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

Ana Sandoval;Joyce A. O’Shaughnessy;Astra M. Liepa;Brenda Grimes;Katheryn Moreira;James Roose;Catherine Keane;Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH
May 29th 2025
Article

Stem Cell Transplant Approaches for Patients With Blood Cancers

Stem Cell Transplant Approaches for Patients With Blood Cancers

David T. Scadden, MD
March 13th 2019
Podcast

Dr. Scadden discusses which blood cancer patients are eligible for stem cell transplantation, as well as the latest advances in the field.


45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

Heather McArthur, MD, MPH;Rebecca Dent, MD;Rina Hui;Yeon Hee Park;Peter Schmid, MD;Jing Wei;Jaime Mejia;Wilbur Pan;Javier Cortés, MD
May 27th 2025
Article

Current Treatment of Esophageal Cancer and Promising Clinical Trials Underway

Current Treatment of Esophageal Cancer and Promising Clinical Trials Underway

Geoffrey Y. Ku, MD
March 13th 2019
Podcast

Dr. Ku discusses considerations in the treatment of esophageal cancer, current treatments, and the emerging role of immunotherapy.


48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status

48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status

Anushree Iyengar;Sandhya Mehta;Hannah Barman;Nivedita Rangarajan;Sue-Ann Woo;Simone T. Sredni;Rosemarie Di Donato;Safak Simsek;Erinn P. Downs;Aziza Nassar;Darren M. Wilson;Katherine Krieser;Elise Bieri Patzke;Natalie Kyek;Jason Hipp;Tyler Wagner, PhD
May 25th 2025
Article

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

Katheryn Moreira;Kathryn Hudson;Wambui Gathirua-Mwangi;Zhanglin Lin Cui;Madeline Richey;Brenda Grimes;Jingru Wang;Astra Liepa;Erich Brechtelsbauer;Raisa Volodarsky;Hatem Soliman, MD
May 24th 2025
Article
Related Content
Advertisement

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US

Ana Sandoval;Joyce A. O’Shaughnessy;Astra M. Liepa;Brenda Grimes;Katheryn Moreira;James Roose;Catherine Keane;Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH
May 29th 2025
Article

Stem Cell Transplant Approaches for Patients With Blood Cancers

Stem Cell Transplant Approaches for Patients With Blood Cancers

David T. Scadden, MD
March 13th 2019
Podcast

Dr. Scadden discusses which blood cancer patients are eligible for stem cell transplantation, as well as the latest advances in the field.


45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery

Heather McArthur, MD, MPH;Rebecca Dent, MD;Rina Hui;Yeon Hee Park;Peter Schmid, MD;Jing Wei;Jaime Mejia;Wilbur Pan;Javier Cortés, MD
May 27th 2025
Article

Current Treatment of Esophageal Cancer and Promising Clinical Trials Underway

Current Treatment of Esophageal Cancer and Promising Clinical Trials Underway

Geoffrey Y. Ku, MD
March 13th 2019
Podcast

Dr. Ku discusses considerations in the treatment of esophageal cancer, current treatments, and the emerging role of immunotherapy.


48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status

48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status

Anushree Iyengar;Sandhya Mehta;Hannah Barman;Nivedita Rangarajan;Sue-Ann Woo;Simone T. Sredni;Rosemarie Di Donato;Safak Simsek;Erinn P. Downs;Aziza Nassar;Darren M. Wilson;Katherine Krieser;Elise Bieri Patzke;Natalie Kyek;Jason Hipp;Tyler Wagner, PhD
May 25th 2025
Article

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval

Katheryn Moreira;Kathryn Hudson;Wambui Gathirua-Mwangi;Zhanglin Lin Cui;Madeline Richey;Brenda Grimes;Jingru Wang;Astra Liepa;Erich Brechtelsbauer;Raisa Volodarsky;Hatem Soliman, MD
May 24th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.