Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Around the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe
Advertisement

Raloxifene Not Recommended After Tamoxifen Failure

October 1, 2001
Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 10
Volume 10
Issue 10

SAN FRANCISCO-Five years of tamoxifen (Nolvadex) is standard treatment for many women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-sensitive breast cancer, but the question of what to do after that is unresolved. Raloxifene (Evista) has been considered by some researchers as a possible next treatment, but preclinical data suggest this will not be a successful strategy. Ruth M. O’Regan, MD, of Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, presented the data at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 95).

SAN FRANCISCO—Five years of tamoxifen (Nolvadex) is standard treatment for many women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-sensitive breast cancer, but the question of what to do after that is unresolved. Raloxifene (Evista) has been considered by some researchers as a possible next treatment, but preclinical data suggest this will not be a successful strategy. Ruth M. O’Regan, MD, of Northwestern University Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, presented the data at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO abstract 95).

Neither tamoxifen nor raloxifene blocked estrogen-stimulated tumor growth in mouse models. "Tamoxifen and raloxifene are cross-resistant in models of tamoxifen-resistant breast and endometrial cancer. We should not assume that raloxifene will be effective after 5 years of tamoxifen," Dr. O’Regan said.

Furthermore, she said, there is evidence from this study that raloxifene, like tamoxifen, can stimulate the growth of some breast or endometrial cancers.

Raloxifene attracted the interest of breast cancer researchers because it is an antiestrogen but, unlike tamoxifen, does not cause endometrial thickening. "We now know that tamoxifen increases the risk of endometrial cancer by threefold to fourfold in women," Dr. O’Regan said.

In this study, athymic mice were bitransplanted with breast cancer tumors on one side and endometrial tumors on the other, and treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene, with and without postmenopausal levels of estrogen.

The study used models of tamoxifen-sensitive cancers and of both short-term and long-term tamoxifen-resistant cancers, simulating the situation of women with breast cancer who develop progressive disease while on tamoxifen.

Tamoxifen and raloxifene had similar effects in all the models tested. In tamoxifen-sensitive tumors, neither drug stimulated growth of breast or endometrial cancers. In the short-term tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer model, both raloxifene and tamoxifen stimulated tumor growth. In the long-term tamoxifen-resistant models, both drugs stimulated growth of tamoxifen-exposed endometrial and breast cancers.

"These results suggest that if raloxifene is used for osteoporosis prevention after 5 years of tamoxifen, it could result in the growth of occult breast cancer or endometrial cancer," Dr. O’Regan said.

Raloxifene also appears to be cross-resistant with tamoxifen in the short-term tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer model, supporting the clinical finding that it is not of value in the treatment of advanced tamoxifen-refractory disease.

"I would certainly be cautious about using raloxifene after 5 years of tamoxifen. A number of ongoing trials are looking at aromatase inhibitors, which may be the way we should go," Dr. O’Regan said. In discussing this paper, Matthew Ellis, MD, PhD, of Duke University, said, "Tamoxifen and raloxifene are definitely cross-resistant. Do not use raloxifene in place of tamoxifen for breast cancer treatment. Do not routinely use raloxifene after tamoxifen to manage osteoporosis. Use bisphosphonates."

Articles in this issue

High-Dose IL-2 Is Standard in Advanced Renal Cell Cancer
RIT Safe, Effective in Elderly and Poor-Prognosis Patients
FDA Approves Xeloda/Taxotere Combination for Advanced Breast Cancer
ODAC Recommends Approval of Radiolabeled Zevalin
Proteomics Moves From the Laboratory to Clinical Research
Radiotherapy Not Needed in Older Lumpectomy Patients With Early Cancer
Raltitrexed + Oxaliplatin for Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Mental Fatigue Worries Chemotherapy Patients
Patients Urged to Work With Professionals Against Fatigue
NCI Director Resigns to Head New Scientific Institute
Combined PET/CT Aids in Head and Neck Cancer Management
MRI Method Predicts Early Response
New Cellular Target Shows Promise in Cancer Treatment
ACR Protests Proposed Diagnostic Mammography Reimbursement Rates
High-Volume Hospitals Better for Some Cancer Surgeries
Recent Videos
Point-of-care manufacturing, scalable manufacturing, and bringing the cost down [can help].
Louis Potters, MD, FASTRO, FABS, FACR, describes how evidence-based radiation protocols may integrate with novel artificial intelligence software.
The use of enhanced imaging and adaptive radiotherapy has lessened the burden on patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy as treatment.
7 experts are featured in this series.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Patients with cancer are subjected to fewer radiotherapy-induced toxicities because of newer, more advanced technologies.
Hosts Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discuss presentations at ESMO 2025 that may impact bladder, kidney, and prostate cancer care.
Mandating additional immunotherapy infusions may help replenish T cells and enhance tumor penetration for solid tumors, including GI malignancies.
A novel cancer database may assist patients determine what clinical trials they are eligible to enroll on and identify the next best steps for treatment.
Related Content
Advertisement

•	Nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to show clinically meaningful PFS improvement over nivolumab alone in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Maintain PFS Benefit vs Nivolumab Monotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR CRC

Kristie L. Kahl
October 20th 2025
Article

With a median follow-up of 50.1 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab achieved a median PFS of not reached compared with 60.8 months with nivolumab monotherapy in this CRC population.


“Paradigm-changing events” are occurring across the small cell lung cancer field in real time, according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.

Leveraging Biology to Advance the Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Paradigm

Anne Chiang, MD
October 20th 2025
Podcast

“Paradigm-changing events” are occurring across the small cell lung cancer field in real time, according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.


The confirmed ORR in the investigational arm was 52.3% vs 46.6% in the chemotherapy arm, with respective complete response rates of 10.9% and 8.5%.

Camrelizumab/Famitinib Show First-Line PFS Benefit in Cervical Cancer

Kyle Doherty
October 20th 2025
Article

The confirmed ORR in the investigational arm was 52.3% vs 46.6% in the chemotherapy arm, with respective complete response rates of 10.9% and 8.5%.


Experts highlight anticipated sessions at the 2025 ESMO Congress, including those on the PSMAddition and EV-303 trials.

Exploring the ESMO 2025 Presentations That May Shift GU Oncology

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
October 16th 2025
Podcast

Experts highlight anticipated sessions at the 2025 ESMO Congress, including those on the PSMAddition and EV-303 trials.


Site Logo

Cancer Vaccine/Pembrolizumab Improves PFS in Treatment-Naive Melanoma

Alex Biese
October 20th 2025
Article

A novel cancer vaccine, IO102-IO103, combined with pembrolizumab, showed promising results in improving PFS for advanced melanoma.


Retrospective cohort findings may inform tailored treatment approaches for frontline metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated non–small cell lung cancer.

Frontline Immunotherapy Improves OS Vs BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in BRAF+ NSCLC

Russ Conroy
October 20th 2025
Article

Retrospective cohort findings may inform tailored treatment approaches for frontline metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated non–small cell lung cancer.

Related Content
Advertisement

•	Nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to show clinically meaningful PFS improvement over nivolumab alone in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Maintain PFS Benefit vs Nivolumab Monotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR CRC

Kristie L. Kahl
October 20th 2025
Article

With a median follow-up of 50.1 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab achieved a median PFS of not reached compared with 60.8 months with nivolumab monotherapy in this CRC population.


“Paradigm-changing events” are occurring across the small cell lung cancer field in real time, according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.

Leveraging Biology to Advance the Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment Paradigm

Anne Chiang, MD
October 20th 2025
Podcast

“Paradigm-changing events” are occurring across the small cell lung cancer field in real time, according to Anne Chiang, MD, PhD.


The confirmed ORR in the investigational arm was 52.3% vs 46.6% in the chemotherapy arm, with respective complete response rates of 10.9% and 8.5%.

Camrelizumab/Famitinib Show First-Line PFS Benefit in Cervical Cancer

Kyle Doherty
October 20th 2025
Article

The confirmed ORR in the investigational arm was 52.3% vs 46.6% in the chemotherapy arm, with respective complete response rates of 10.9% and 8.5%.


Experts highlight anticipated sessions at the 2025 ESMO Congress, including those on the PSMAddition and EV-303 trials.

Exploring the ESMO 2025 Presentations That May Shift GU Oncology

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
October 16th 2025
Podcast

Experts highlight anticipated sessions at the 2025 ESMO Congress, including those on the PSMAddition and EV-303 trials.


Site Logo

Cancer Vaccine/Pembrolizumab Improves PFS in Treatment-Naive Melanoma

Alex Biese
October 20th 2025
Article

A novel cancer vaccine, IO102-IO103, combined with pembrolizumab, showed promising results in improving PFS for advanced melanoma.


Retrospective cohort findings may inform tailored treatment approaches for frontline metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated non–small cell lung cancer.

Frontline Immunotherapy Improves OS Vs BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in BRAF+ NSCLC

Russ Conroy
October 20th 2025
Article

Retrospective cohort findings may inform tailored treatment approaches for frontline metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated non–small cell lung cancer.

Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.