Panelists discuss how the 2021 WHO classification has fundamentally shifted glioma diagnosis from histologic appearance to molecular markers, particularly IDH mutation status, which now determines treatment strategies and prognosis.
Content above is prompted by the following:
The 2021 WHO classification has fundamentally transformed glioma management by emphasizing molecular markers over traditional histologic appearance. This paradigm shift places IDH mutation status at the center of diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, creating 2 distinct disease categories with markedly different prognoses and treatment approaches. The classification change represents more than a laboratory detail—it has become the foundation for personalized glioma care.
IDH-mutant gliomas demonstrate characteristically slower growth patterns and significantly better patient outcomes compared to their IDH wild-type counterparts. These tumors typically respond more favorably to temozolomide chemotherapy and are associated with prolonged survival rates. The molecular distinction enables clinicians to counsel patients more accurately about prognosis and tailor treatment intensity accordingly, often allowing for less aggressive initial approaches in appropriate cases.
The integration of molecular classification into clinical practice has revolutionized patient counseling and treatment planning. Clinicians now explain to patients that their tumor's genetic makeup, particularly IDH status, determines therapeutic strategy more than microscopic appearance alone. This molecular-first approach enables more precise prognostication and supports individualized treatment decisions, potentially allowing for surveillance or targeted therapies while avoiding unnecessary radiation or chemotherapy in select patients with favorable molecular profiles.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.