Panelists discuss how they approach the treatment journey by prioritizing early IDH mutation detection, coordinating multidisciplinary teams for maximal safe resection, and utilizing advanced surgical techniques to optimize outcomes while preserving neurologic function.
Content above is prompted by the following:
The diagnostic workflow for suspected gliomas begins with clinical presentation assessment, typically involving seizures or neurological symptoms, followed by comprehensive MRI evaluation. Advanced centers may utilize preoperative 2-hydroxyglutarate MR spectroscopy to predict IDH status before surgery. The multidisciplinary team approach remains crucial, with early integration of neurosurgical consultation to determine optimal resection strategy while prioritizing maximal safe tumor removal over aggressive resection that risks neurological deficits.
Surgical planning requires careful balance between tumor removal and preservation of neurological function, particularly given the favorable prognosis of IDH-mutant gliomas and the typically young patient population. Modern neurosurgical techniques including functional MRI, intraoperative monitoring, and awake craniotomy procedures enable safer resections in eloquent brain regions. The extent of resection influences subsequent treatment decisions, though the emphasis remains on achieving maximal safe resection rather than gross total resection at the expense of neurological function.
Post-surgical molecular profiling becomes the critical next step, with rapid turnaround essential for treatment planning. The multidisciplinary team reconvenes to review pathology results and plan individualized treatment approaches based on molecular findings, tumor location, extent of resection, and patient factors. This collaborative approach ensures optimal timing of interventions while considering the patient's age, symptoms, and treatment preferences. The workflow emphasizes that even patients with IDH wild-type tumors have better outcomes than historically achieved, maintaining optimism throughout the diagnostic process.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.