Robert J. Motzer, MD, on a Phase 3 Trial Evaluating MK-6482 Plus Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Advanced ccRCC

Video

The medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center highlighted what clinicians treating patients with advanced ccRCC should understand about this trial in progress.

A phase 3 trial (NCT04586231) evaluating the efficacy and safety of belzutifan (MK-6482) plus lenvatinib (Lenvima) compared with cabozantinib (Cabometyx) in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) who have progressed on prior anti–PD-1/L1 therapy was announced at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

The randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter trial will include adults with histologically confirmed, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic ccRCC with progressive disease on or after first- or second-line systemic treatment with an anti–PD-1/L1 therapy. Approximately 708 patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either MK-6482 plus lenvatinib or cabozantinib. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

The co-primary end points are progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival. Key secondary end points include objective response rate, duration of response per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by BICR, and safety.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Robert J. Motzer, MD, a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discussed what he believes clinicians should understand about this trial in progress.

Transcription:

This is a trial that looks at patients who have progressed on an [immuno-oncology; IO] therapy and compares cabozantinib, a standard therapy, to a standard [tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TKI], lenvatinib. [Lenvatinib] is also a standard TKI in the second-line [when its] combined with everolimus, but substituting for everolimus [in this combination] is MK-6482, which is a new HIF inhibitor that there’s been a lot of excitement around. It looks like it’s particularly effective in heavily pretreated patients or in patients that have resistant tumors. And so, with the advent of these new IO therapies in first-line, we’re grappling for what’s the best treatment in second or third line and I think this particular trial is really a priority. It looks to identify what’s the best treatment now that the paradigm has changed in first line. It brings in this new novel drug MK-6482, a HIF inhibitor, and it looks at the question as to whether that HIF plus TKI gives additional efficacy. I’m really excited about that trial. I think it’s going to be a priority global trial and a very good option for patients.

Reference:

Motzer RJ, Liu Y, Perini RF, Zhang Y, Heng DYC. Phase III study evaluating efficacy and safety of MK-6482 + lenvatinib versus cabozantinib for second- or third-line therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who progressed after prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 6):TPS372. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.TPS372

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content