Salma Jabbour, MD, on the Impact of the Ongoing KEYNOTE-799 Study

Video

The chief of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey spoke about the possible implications of the KEYNOTE-799 study findings.

Pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiation therapy appears promising for patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to results from the ongoing KEYNOTE-799 study (NCT03631784) presented at the IASLC 2020 World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC) Singapore.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Salma Jabbour, MD, chief of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology at the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, discussed the implications of these study findings and how they may impact the treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC.

Transcription:

The implications of these findings are that this combination of therapies with earlier incorporation of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy is important. The current standard of care is really to give chemoradiation as a curative therapy for [patients with] stage III unresectable non–small cell lung cancer and these patients then go on to receive consolidative immunotherapy using durvalumab [Imfinzi]. And although these results are very promising, about 20% to 30% of patients never go on to receive durvalumab, which represents a significant unmet clinical need. And as a result, earlier incorporation of immunotherapy for stage III [disease after receipt of] chemoradiation means that [using] immunotherapy potentially earlier has a chance to treat their micrometastatic disease—the disease we can’t see but might be circulating in the bloodstream—to treat it earlier and to hopefully help those patients achieve better results with their therapy. The real implications here are that we can hopefully help patients with more promising therapies going forward.

Reference:

Reck M, Lee KH, Frost N, et al. Pembrolizumab plus platinum chemotherapy and radiotherapy in unresectable, locally advanced, stage III NSCLC: KEYNOTE-799. Presented at the IASLC 2020 World Conference on Lung Cancer Singapore. Abstract OA02.03.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
4 experts in this video
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Related Content