Satya Das, MD, MSCI, on the Impact of PRRT in Patients With Well-Differentiated NETs

Video

The expert in hematology/oncology discussed the implications of a study which evaluated the use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

A study presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium suggested that among patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs) who were treated with 3 to 4 doses of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu 177-dotatate (Lutathera), those with lower clinical scores had better progression-free survival (PFS) than those with higher clinical scores.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Satya Das, MD, MSCI, assistant professor of Medicine in the department of Medicine in the division of Hematology/Oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, explained the implications of these study findings.

Transcription:

What we can say is that rather than just [having] a smorgasbord of [patients] who should get PRRT when, there is a way to actually categorize the patients who should get it. Our findings demonstrate that this score comprised of those 5 categories [available non-PRRT treatments for tumor type, prior systemic treatments, patient symptoms, tumor burden in critical organs, and peritoneal carcinomatosis presence] is a comprehensive manner of including the patients who should be considered for PRRT. And I think the most compelling thing about the score is that many oncologists have been keeping PRRT for later. So basically, after patients progress through all of the therapies, then we’ve been going to PRRT. But the biology of the treatment is such that it may actually be more effective in patients who are less pretreated with smaller amounts of disease. And I think our score demonstrates that.

The most interesting things are that in patients with low scores—even when you go for, let’s say, a score from 1 to a 3, which is very low disease [with] less pretreatment–there’s a significantly higher risk of progression or a lack of benefit from the PRRT. Our hope is with these findings, which still require validation [that] we’re trying to [get] with additional cohorts of patients, is that earlier incorporation of PRRT may lead to better outcomes.

Reference:

Das S, Du L, Schad A, et al. A clinical score (CS) for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NETs) under consideration for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu 177-dotatate. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 3). Abstract: 363.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content