Sequencing Strategies and Patient Selection for Bispecific Antibodies in RRMM

Opinion
Video

Panelists discuss how CAR T-cell therapy should generally precede bispecifics when possible due to T-cell exhaustion concerns, though they agree there are virtually no absolute contraindications to bispecific therapy.

The sequencing of T-cell redirection therapies requires careful consideration of target expression and T-cell fitness, as prior bispecific exposure can lead to T-cell exhaustion that impacts subsequent treatments. Patients who receive BCMA-directed bispecifics first may experience reduced efficacy from subsequent GPRC5D-targeted therapies due to compromised T-cell function rather than target loss. This has important implications for treatment planning, as maintaining T-cell fitness becomes crucial for maximizing the benefit of sequential immunotherapies throughout a patient’s treatment journey.

Most patients are considered appropriate candidates for bispecific therapy, with very few absolute contraindications identified in clinical practice. The primary concerns relate to disease location rather than patient characteristics, particularly for plasmacytomas in critical anatomical sites where treatment-induced inflammation could cause dangerous complications. Extramedullary disease may show lower response rates, but this can potentially be addressed through radiation therapy or combination approaches, and emerging data with combination therapies may overcome these limitations for patients with challenging disease presentations.

Frailty does not appear to predict either progression-free survival or treatment-related mortality with bispecific antibodies, making these therapies accessible to patients who might not tolerate other interventions. The ability to modify dosing, delay treatments, or temporarily discontinue therapy provides crucial flexibility for managing patients with complex medical conditions. This adaptability, combined with the lack of absolute contraindications, positions bispecific antibodies as viable options for the majority of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma, including those typically excluded from clinical trials due to advanced age, comorbidities, or social factors.

Recent Videos
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
Current FDA expectations may allow patients to return to their community physicians at 2 weeks after administration of anitocabtagene autoleucel.
Based on its mechanism of action, anito-cel may cause fewer instances of cytokine release syndrome and delayed toxicities vs other therapies.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Related Content