Stephen Liu, MD, on Key Takeaways From the ARROW Trial of Pralsetinib for RET+ NSCLC

Video

At ASCO 2021, CancerNetwork® spoke with Stephen Liu, MD, about his research on the ARROW trial and how these results might impact the treatment of patients with RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer who are potential candidates for treatment with pralsetinib.

CancerNetwork® sat down with Stephen Liu, MD, of the Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting to talk about how results of the ARROW trial (NCT02412878), which looked at pralsetinib (Gavreto) as therapy for patients with RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the frontline, influence the need to select patients for targeted therapy. He emphasized that delivering treatment effectively involves uncovering oncogenic drivers of the disease, such as genetic mutations.

Transcription:

I think that the key takeaway from this study is that we can see extremely effective [drugs with] overwhelmingly positive results when we deliver treatment to the right patients. If we give this drug to an all-comer population, response will be quite low. Whereas if we can rationally select and identify these patients a priori and deliver treatment [where] it makes sense, we can see these outcomes where almost everyone has a response [and] where responses are very durable and toxicity is minimal. It really is a matter of delivering this treatment where it’s needed. That rational drug development has been the paradigm for the past few years in lung cancer. It extends to the resistance setting as well where past initial diagnosis, if we can apply that same paradigm post initial progression, we can deliver drugs that can overcome acquired resistance in the future as well.

Reference

Curigliano G, Gainor JF, Greisinger F, et al. Safety and efficacy of pralsetinib in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Update from the ARROW trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):9089. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9089

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
4 experts in this video
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Related Content