Sumanta K. Pal, MD, FASCO, on Tolerability of Lenvatinib and Everolimus to Treat Patients With RCC

Video

Pal detailed the phase 2 trial of lenvatinib at 2 starting doses plus everolimus to treat patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Sumanta K. Pal, MD, FASCO, spoke with CancerNetwork® to detail a phase 2 trial (NCT03173560) of lenvatinib (Lenvima) at 2 starting doses and everolimus to treat patients with renal cell carcinoma, discussing challenges with tolerability of the drugs from a presentation at the 2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

Transcription:

This particular combination with lenvatinib and everolimus doesn’t include an [immunotherapy] component, it’s just pure targeted therapy. And I would suggest that, in terms of tolerability, it has its challenges. I was hoping that perhaps we could get away with using a lower dose and thereby mitigate some toxicity, but it doesn’t appear that that’s the case. It certainly does suggest to me that perhaps there are challenges as we try to implement the higher dose of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab. [In the CLEAR study (NCT02811861)], they use a dose of 20 mg of lenvatinib, but I can't imagine that that's going to be any easier for patients.

Reference:

Pal SK, Puente J, Heng DYK, et al. Phase II trial of lenvatinib (LEN) at two starting doses + everolimus (EVE) in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Results by independent imaging review (IIR) and prior immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Presented at: 2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. Abstract 307.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content