Superiority Noted in Adagrasib Vs Docetaxel in Patients With KRAS G12C-Mutated NSCLC

News
Article

Superior efficacy outcomes were noted when adagrasib was used to treat patients with KRAS G12C NSCLC and among those with brain metastases.

Superior efficacy outcomes were noted when adagrasib was used to treat patients with KRAS G12C NSCLC and among those with brain metastases.

Superior efficacy outcomes were noted when adagrasib was used to treat patients with KRAS G12C NSCLC and among those with brain metastases.

Patients with docetaxel among patients with previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and baseline brain metastases (BM) treated with adagrasib (Krazati) had improved outcomes vs docetaxel, according to results from the phase 3 KRYSTAL-12 trial (NCT04685135) presented at the 2024 European Society of Medical Oncology Congress.

The findings demonstrated that among patients with baseline brain metastases, the median intracranial time to progression was 18.6 months (95% CI, 9.6-not evaluable [NE]) in the adagrasib arm and NE (95% CI, 4.2-NE) in the docetaxel arm (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.26-1.40). Additionally, the intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio for patients with brain metastases was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.50-1.73).

The study included 453 patients with KRAS G12C–mutated locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC who had been previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti–PD-(L)1 therapy and who were randomized 2:1 to receive 600 mg of oral adagrasib twice daily or 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel every three weeks intravenously.

Patients with treated, neurologically stable brain metastases at baseline were eligible for participation, and 114 patients (25.2%) had baseline brain metastases (78 in the adagrasib arm, 36 in the docetaxel arm).

At a median follow-up of 7.2 months, median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.1-5.8) in the adagrasib arm and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.2) in the docetaxel arm among patients with brain metastases; 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.8-7.2) in the adagrasib arm and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.4-5.6) in the docetaxel arm in patients without brain metastases.

Furthermore, the objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the adagrasib vs docetaxel arm among patients both with (26.9% vs 2.8%) and without (33.6% vs 11.2%) baseline brain metastases, as was the median duration of response (DOR) for patients with (7.4 vs 5.4 months) and without (8.3 vs 5.4 months) baseline brain metastases.

Treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) were also reported to be comparable across treatment arms and irrespective of the presence of baseline brain metastases. Among patients with brain metastases, 94% of patients in the adagrasib arm and 86% of patients in the docetaxel arm experienced a TRAE, while among patients without brain metastases 94% and 87% of patients in the adagrasib and docetaxel arms, respectively, experienced a TRAE. There were 5 total treatment-related deaths, 4 among patients in the adagrasib arm without brain metastases and 1 in the docetaxel arm with brain metastases.

“Adagrasib demonstrated an improved intracranial efficacy over docetaxel in patients with treated, neurologically stable baseline brain metastases,” Professor Fabrice Barlesi, MD, PhD, thoracic oncologist, Paris Saclay University and chief executive officer of Gustave Roussy Institute, in France, said in a presentation of the findings. “Systemic overall response rate, duration of response and PFS were numerically greater with adagrasib compared to docetaxel, regardless of the presence of brain metastases, the safety profiles of adagrasib and docetaxel were comparable in patients with and without brain metastasis, and were consistent with all randomized patients. Overall, these results clearly reinforce adagrasib as an efficacious treatment option for patients including with baseline brain metastasis with previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated NSCLC.”

Reference

Barlesi F, Yao W, Duruisseaux M, et al. Adagrasib (ADA) vs docetaxel (DOCE) in patients (pts) with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC and baseline brain metastases (BM): Results from KRYSTAL-12. Presented at: 2024 ESMO Congress; September 13-17, 2024; Barcelona, Spain. Abstract LBA57.

Recent Videos
Harmonizing protocols across the health care system may bolster the feasibility of giving bispecifics to those with lymphoma in a community setting.
Although accuracy remains a focus in whole-body MRI testing in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, comfortable testing experiences may ease anxiety.
Subsequent testing among patients in a prospective study may affirm the ability of cfDNA sequencing to detect cancers in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
cfDNA sequencing may allow for more accessible, frequent, and sensitive testing compared with standard surveillance in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
STX-478 showed efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors regardless of whether they had kinase domain or helical PI3K mutations.
STX-478 may avoid adverse effects associated with prior PI3K inhibitors that lack selectivity for the mutated protein vs the wild-type protein.
Phase 1 data may show the possibility of rationally designing agents that can preferentially target PI3K mutations in solid tumors.
Funding a clinical trial to further assess liquid biopsy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome may help with detecting cancers early across the board.
Michael J. Hall, MD, MS, FASCO, discusses the need to reduce barriers to care for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, including those who live in rural areas.
Related Content