Survival Advantage for Docetaxel Combination in NSCLC

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 11 No 1
Volume 11
Issue 1

LISBON, Portugal-In patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line docetaxel (Taxotere) plus cisplatin (Platinol) has been shown to offer a survival advantage relative to a standard regimen of vinorelbine

LISBON, Portugal—In patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line docetaxel (Taxotere) plus cisplatin (Platinol) has been shown to offer a survival advantage relative to a standard regimen of vinorelbine (Navelbine) and cisplatin.

Frank V. Fossella, MD, medical director of the Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Care Center at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, reported results of the study (TAX 326) at the 11th European Cancer Conference (ECCO abstract 562).

With more than 1,200 patients from 29 countries enrolled, TAX 326 is one of the largest phase III trials ever conducted in NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks; docetaxel 75 mg/m² plus carboplatin (Paraplatin) AUC 6 every 3 weeks; or a control regimen of vinorelbine 25 mg/m²/wk plus cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 4 weeks.

"Overall survival in the docetaxel-cisplatin arm was greater than that in the control group, with a significant P value of .044," Dr. Fossella reported. "The curves separated at about 4 months and remained nonoverlapping throughout the follow-up period."

The docetaxel-cisplatin regimen yielded a median survival of 11.3 months, 1-year survival of 46%, and 2-year survival of 21%, in contrast to corresponding values of 10.1 months, 41%, and 14% for the control regimen (see Table). "The objective response rate was also in favor of docetaxel-cisplatin—32% vs 25%, with a P value of .029," Dr. Fossella said.

The response rate, median survival, 1-year survival, and 2-year survival were equivalent in the docetaxel-carboplatin and vinorelbine-cisplatin arms.

All three treatment arms were generally well tolerated, Dr. Fossella said. The vinorelbine-cisplatin combination was responsible for the highest incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity, including anemia, nausea, and vomiting, whereas diarrhea was more common in patients treated with docetaxel-cisplatin.

The control regimen was associated with deteriorations in global quality of life and global health status, more weight loss, and less improvement in pain score, compared with both docetaxel-platinum arms.

"The impressive impact on survival and quality of life demonstrated with the docetaxel-cisplatin combination could profoundly change the treatment standard of patients with NSCLC," Dr. Fossella concluded. 

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.