Tumor Reduction and No Disease Progression Seen With Cabozantinib in Advanced Clear Cell RCC

Article

Research suggests patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant cabozantinib saw reductions in tumor size with no disease progression.

Treatment with neoadjuvant cabozantinib (Cabometyx) for patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) led to tumor reductions with no disease progression, according to results presented at the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

Results from the analysis, which were presented by Mehmet A. Bilen, MD, an associate professor in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta and director of the Genitourinary Medical Oncology Program at Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, also demonstrated no treatment-related grade 4 or grade 5 adverse events.

“We showed that cabozantinib was clinically active and safe in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear-cell RCC,” Bilen told CancerNetwork®.

In the analysis of this study (NCT04022343), 17 patients with biopsy-proven clear-cell RCC were treated with neoadjuvant cabozantinib at a starting dose of 60 mg once per day for 12 weeks. Of the patients in the study, 82.4% were men with a median age of 58 years (range: 42-86 years).

“In recent years, highly active treatment options become available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma,” Bilen said. “The increased response rates with cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, along with the other neoadjuvant [tyrosine kinase inhibitor] data, we studied the role for cabozantinib in the neoadjuvant setting in this investigator-initiated clinical trial.”

The primary outcome of this study was an objective response rate at 12 weeks per RECIST v1.1, including complete and partial responses. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, safety, surgical outcome, clinical outcome (overall survival and disease-free survival) and quality of life.

All patients had 12 weeks of treatment with cabozantinib, and most patients (n = 16) underwent surgery without delay after completing a 4-week wash-out period. The one patient who did not undergo surgery refused the procedure for personal reasons and received further systemic treatment.

Results from this analysis demonstrated that all patients had tumor reduction. In particular, 5 patients (29.4%) had a partial response (overall response rate = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.1-0.56) and 12 patients had stable disease. Progression of disease was not observed in the patients treated with cabozantinib. The primary renal tumor size was reduced by a median of 23% (range: 6-45).

“Neoadjuvant treatment is well established in different solid tumors such as breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancers and others,” Bilen said. “Effective neoadjuvant treatment options are needed in patients with locally advanced RCC. We try to explore this in this population and show its feasibility. We are hoping with additional clinical trial data, we are able to establish the role of presurgical treatment in this patient population.”

At the end of treatment, 1 patient who was deemed to be unresectable at the start of the study was considered resectable after 12 weeks. Two patients also converted from radial nephrectomy at the start of the study to partial nephrectomy at the end of treatment.

The most common adverse events that occurred throughout treatment included anorexia, diarrhea, hypertension, fatigue, and nausea.One serious adverse event occurred that was related to a pulmonary embolism. Some dose reductions did occur because of adverse events; 5 patients decreased to a 40-mg dose and 2 patients decreased to a 20-mg dose. Two patients died at the time this analysis was performed, including 1 patient who died from COVID-19 and 1 patient who died from an unknown cause.

“A larger clinical trial is needed to further establish the role of presurgical treatment in RCC,” Bilen said. “This will allow us to understand the long-term role of those treatments. In addition to that, other agents such as immunotherapy combinations need to be studied in this space as well. Additionally, we also need to investigate the optimum duration of treatment, ideal clinical trial endpoints and additional correlative studies that will help us to understand the biology of RCC.”

Reference

Bilen MA, Liu Y, Nazha B, et al. Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant cabozantinib in patients with locally advanced non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Presented at: 2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; February 17-19, 2022; Abstract #340

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Sumanta Kumar Pal, MD, FASCO; and Rahul Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Related Content