Women Are Replacing Old Breast Implants With New

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 12
Volume 13
Issue 12

Results of a study conducted by the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ASPRS) showed that 84% of women who have had their breast implants removed have replaced them with new implants. In 1998, 32,262 women with breast augmentation had their breast implants removed, and 27,320 of them opted for new implants.

Results of a study conducted by the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ASPRS) showed that 84% of women who have had their breast implants removed have replaced them with new implants. In 1998, 32,262 women with breast augmentation had their breast implants removed, and 27,320 of them opted for new implants.

Breast implant removals have increased 76% since 1992, with only 4% of patients having them removed due to their concern over the safety of breast implants. “The increase in breast implant removals most likely reflects implants that were inserted prior to 1992,” says ASPRS President Paul Schnur, MD. “Women are comfortable about the safety of their breast implants so as their implants age, we will continue to see more implant exchanges.”

Currently, most women receive implants consisting of silicone rubber shells that are filled with sterile saltwater. In this study, 93% of implants were removed due to physical symptoms, such as signs of rupture or capsular contracture. “If a saline implant leaks or ruptures, the saltwater is harmlessly absorbed by the body and the implant is removed and replaced,” says Dr. Schnur.

Other reasons for removal of the implants included capsular contracture (ie, a hardening of the breast due to tightening of the scar or capsule around the implant). This study also found that 53% of patients whose breast implants were removed required removal or scoring of scar tissue.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Numerous clinical trials vindicating the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy in SCLC have emerged over the last several years.
Related Content