75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 66

75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial

75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial

Background/Significance

Early-stage breast cancer is commonly treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI). A radiation boost to the tumor bed is also recommended in some cases, is dependent on patient age and disease characteristics, and is usually delivered following BCS and WBI. We conducted a prospective, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04871516) in which the radiation boost was delivered preoperatively instead of postoperatively, the first results of which have been previously published. Due to concerns that the preoperative radiation boost could possibly alter the genomic profile of the tumor, we compared the 21-gene assay results (Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score) before and after the boost, to see if a change may have altered systemic therapy.

Materials and Methods

Patients received a preoperative boost of 13.32 Gy in 4 daily fractions, followed by BCS 1 to 3 weeks after, followed by WBI of 36.63 Gy in 11 daily fractions 3 to 8 weeks after surgery. A total of 55 patients were enrolled in the trial. We randomly selected 17 patients to compare the 21-gene assay results before and after the boost. We used paired Student’s t-test to see whether the difference between the 2 sets of scores is statistically significant.

Results

Tissue was sufficient to run the assay on the core needle biopsy and the lumpectomy specimens in 15 patients. All patients had clinically negative axillary nodes. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 53-79). Average tumor size was 13.15 mm (range, 7-21). There were 3 lobular, 1 mucinous, and 11 ductal invasive carcinomas. All tumors were hormone receptor–positive and HER2-negative. The mean 21-gene assay result prior to the radiation boost was 12 (± SD, 7.92), and after was 13.47 (± SD 6.93). Paired Student’s t-test showed no significant difference between the pre- and postradiation results (t = 0.5399, P = .6). In 9 of 15 (60%) patients, the results of the 21-gene assay slightly increased after the boost by an average of 4.78 points (± SD, 2.05), and in 6 of 15 (40%), they slightly decreased by an average of 3.5 points (± SD, 2.74). In none of these 15 patients would the preoperative boost have altered systemic therapy.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients from our preoperative radiation boost trial, results of the 21-gene assay were not significantly changed after the radiation boost. This indicates that, in this protocol, preoperative radiation boost would likely not alter systemic therapy decisions.

Articles in this issue

2 Preventive Care and Screening Adherence Among Women Surviving Breast Cancer
2 Preventive Care and Screening Adherence Among Women Surviving Breast Cancer
3 Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Alive and Well in the Bronx
3 Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Alive and Well in the Bronx
4 Evaluating AI-Driven Responses in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Response Formats
4 Evaluating AI-Driven Responses in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Response Formats
5 Correlation Between Visual Impairment and Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the National Health Interview Surveys
5 Correlation Between Visual Impairment and Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the National Health Interview Surveys
6 Peer Support Programming Among Women At-Risk for Surviving Breast Cancer: Facilitators and Barriers to Community-Based Patient Navigation and the Role of Quality of Life
6 Peer Support Programming Among Women At-Risk for Surviving Breast Cancer: Facilitators and Barriers to Community-Based Patient Navigation and the Role of Quality of Life
7 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Features
7 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Features
8 A Case Series Exploring Characteristics and Outcomes of Metachronous Primary Breast and Lung Cancer in a Diverse Cohort
8 A Case Series Exploring Characteristics and Outcomes of Metachronous Primary Breast and Lung Cancer in a Diverse Cohort
9 Body Mass Index, Cancer Risk Behaviors, and Readiness for Dietary Change Among Women Surviving With Breast Cancer
9 Body Mass Index, Cancer Risk Behaviors, and Readiness for Dietary Change Among Women Surviving With Breast Cancer
10 AI as a Bridge: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Their Breast Radiology Reports?
10 AI as a Bridge: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Their Breast Radiology Reports?
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
Recent Videos
Predictors of response have a significant effect on clinical decision-making because they may help oncologists select the best treatment for specific patients.
Delaying treatment with ruxolitinib by more than a year leads to decreased response rates and overall survival in patients with myelofibrosis.
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
Related Content