75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 66

75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial

75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial

Background/Significance

Early-stage breast cancer is commonly treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI). A radiation boost to the tumor bed is also recommended in some cases, is dependent on patient age and disease characteristics, and is usually delivered following BCS and WBI. We conducted a prospective, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04871516) in which the radiation boost was delivered preoperatively instead of postoperatively, the first results of which have been previously published. Due to concerns that the preoperative radiation boost could possibly alter the genomic profile of the tumor, we compared the 21-gene assay results (Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score) before and after the boost, to see if a change may have altered systemic therapy.

Materials and Methods

Patients received a preoperative boost of 13.32 Gy in 4 daily fractions, followed by BCS 1 to 3 weeks after, followed by WBI of 36.63 Gy in 11 daily fractions 3 to 8 weeks after surgery. A total of 55 patients were enrolled in the trial. We randomly selected 17 patients to compare the 21-gene assay results before and after the boost. We used paired Student’s t-test to see whether the difference between the 2 sets of scores is statistically significant.

Results

Tissue was sufficient to run the assay on the core needle biopsy and the lumpectomy specimens in 15 patients. All patients had clinically negative axillary nodes. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 53-79). Average tumor size was 13.15 mm (range, 7-21). There were 3 lobular, 1 mucinous, and 11 ductal invasive carcinomas. All tumors were hormone receptor–positive and HER2-negative. The mean 21-gene assay result prior to the radiation boost was 12 (± SD, 7.92), and after was 13.47 (± SD 6.93). Paired Student’s t-test showed no significant difference between the pre- and postradiation results (t = 0.5399, P = .6). In 9 of 15 (60%) patients, the results of the 21-gene assay slightly increased after the boost by an average of 4.78 points (± SD, 2.05), and in 6 of 15 (40%), they slightly decreased by an average of 3.5 points (± SD, 2.74). In none of these 15 patients would the preoperative boost have altered systemic therapy.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients from our preoperative radiation boost trial, results of the 21-gene assay were not significantly changed after the radiation boost. This indicates that, in this protocol, preoperative radiation boost would likely not alter systemic therapy decisions.

Articles in this issue

36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
Related Content