82 Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of ICARUS-BREAST01: A Phase 2 Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 34

82 Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of ICARUS-BREAST01: A Phase 2 Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer

82 Efficacy, Safety, and Biomarker Analysis of ICARUS-BREAST01: A Phase 2 Study of Patritumab Deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer

Background

Despite the improved clinical outcomes achieved with endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor–positive/ HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) advanced breast cancer, few effective therapeutic agents are available beyond progression. HER3 expression is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors and ET. Patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) is an antibody drug conjugate composed of an anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody conjugated to a topoisomerase I inhibitor by a cleavable peptide linker. The phase 2 ICARUS-BREAST01 (NCT04965766) trial is an academic, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluating activity, safety, and biomarkers of response/resistance to HER3-DXd in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer who progressed on CDK 4/6i and 1 line of chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Adult patients were enrolled to receive HER3-DXd at 5.6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (cORR) by local investigator assessment. Secondary end points were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Exploratory translational analyses were conducted on blood and tumor samples.

Results

At the April 16, 2024, data cutoff, 99 patients were included and 19 were still on treatment. Median age was 57.0 years (IQR, 48.0-66.0 years), median duration of prior CDK4/6i was 13.7 months (IQR, 2.9-42.0 months). At a median follow-up of 15.3 months (95% CI, 13.0-17.2) cORR was 53.5% (95% CI, 43.2%-63.6%), CBR was 62.6% (95% CI, 52.3%-72.1%), median PFS was 9.2 months (95% CI, 8.0-12.8), and median DOR was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.2-not evaluable). Treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs; any grade/≥3) occurred in 98.0%/50.1% of patients. TEAEs led to dose reduction/discontinuation in 20.2%/11.1%. The most frequent treatment-related TEAEs were fatigue (82.8%/10.1%), nausea (74.7%/14.1%), and diarrhea (52.5%/10.1%); 8 patients (8.1%) had centrally adjudicated interstitial lung disease (6 grade 1, 2 grade 2). Data on HER3 expression and translational analyses on tumor and blood samples will be presented.

Conclusion

HER3-DXd showed clinically meaningful activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer that progressed after ≥2 lines of therapy. Further studies are warranted to confirm the role of HER3-DXd in this setting.

Articles in this issue

39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Related Content