96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 39-40

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Background

Endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard-of-care (SOC) for first-line estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Sequential ET monotherapy or combinations are used second line post-ET plus CDK4/6i. Combination regimens in second-line or late metastatic breast cancer can be associated with significant toxicities and high discontinuation rates. ESR1 mutations, a type of acquired resistance, eventually emerge in up to 50% of patients after first-line treatment for ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial (NCT03778931), patients with ESR1-mutated tumors had a 45% reduction in risk of progression or death with elacestrant vs SOC ET (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.8 months vs 1.9 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). In patients with 12 months or more prior ET plus CDK4/6i, the median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). Elacestrant was FDA-approved in January 2023 for the treatment of postmenopausal ER+/HER2– ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer with progression after at least one line of ET. Sufficient time has passed since approval to characterize the real-world use of elacestrant in the current treatment landscape. This study aims to describe the real-world PFS of elacestrant overall and in patients with no prior exposure to fulvestrant, only 1 to 2 lines of ET, 3 or more lines of ET, and/or visceral metastases.

Materials and Methods

Adults with diagnosed ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer who initiated elacestrant in a real-world setting between January 2023 and May 2024 were identified in the Komodo Research Database. Demographic information described at index date (time of first administration of elacestrant) included metastatic sites identified during the 6-month baseline period prior to index date and prior metastatic breast cancer treatments. Real-world PFS was defined as time from index date until earliest outcome (start of next line of metastatic breast cancer therapy to progression or death). Patients were censored at first occurrence of end of data availability or end of health plan enrollment.

Results

A total of 276 patients treated were evaluated (median age 63 years, 86% visceral metastases, 90% prior CDK4/6i, 61% prior fulvestrant). Real-world PFS was prolonged with elacestrant in patients with prior fulvestrant and in the overall population in all subgroups (Table).

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, elacestrant showed a consistent real-world PFS benefit among all patients with ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer and across clinically relevant subgroups. The real-world PFS with elacestrant exceeded the overall median PFS in EMERALD and is longer when patients are treated in earlier lines.

Articles in this issue

2 Preventive Care and Screening Adherence Among Women Surviving Breast Cancer
2 Preventive Care and Screening Adherence Among Women Surviving Breast Cancer
3 Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Alive and Well in the Bronx
3 Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Alive and Well in the Bronx
4 Evaluating AI-Driven Responses in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Response Formats
4 Evaluating AI-Driven Responses in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Response Formats
5 Correlation Between Visual Impairment and Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the National Health Interview Surveys
5 Correlation Between Visual Impairment and Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the National Health Interview Surveys
6 Peer Support Programming Among Women At-Risk for Surviving Breast Cancer: Facilitators and Barriers to Community-Based Patient Navigation and the Role of Quality of Life
6 Peer Support Programming Among Women At-Risk for Surviving Breast Cancer: Facilitators and Barriers to Community-Based Patient Navigation and the Role of Quality of Life
7 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Features
7 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Features
8 A Case Series Exploring Characteristics and Outcomes of Metachronous Primary Breast and Lung Cancer in a Diverse Cohort
8 A Case Series Exploring Characteristics and Outcomes of Metachronous Primary Breast and Lung Cancer in a Diverse Cohort
9 Body Mass Index, Cancer Risk Behaviors, and Readiness for Dietary Change Among Women Surviving With Breast Cancer
9 Body Mass Index, Cancer Risk Behaviors, and Readiness for Dietary Change Among Women Surviving With Breast Cancer
10 AI as a Bridge: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Their Breast Radiology Reports?
10 AI as a Bridge: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Their Breast Radiology Reports?
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content