Amifostine Offers Little Advantage in Small Trial of Twice-Daily Radiation Plus Chemotherapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 8
Volume 10
Issue 8

ST LOUIS-In a small phase II study, amifostine (Ethyol) provided little advantage in esophageal protection for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with chemotherapy and twice-daily radiation. Results of the trial were reported by Todd H. Wasserman, MD. Dr. Wasserman is professor of radiation oncology and clinical chief, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis.

ST LOUIS—In a small phase II study, amifostine (Ethyol) provided little advantage in esophageal protection for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with chemotherapy and twice-daily radiation. Results of the trial were reported by Todd H. Wasserman, MD. Dr. Wasserman is professor of radiation oncology and clinical chief, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis.

"We entered 34 patients into a limited phase II trial with small-cell lung cancer. This study used BID radiation with etoposide (VePesid) and cisplatin (Platinol) and amifostine at 340 mg/m² IV," Dr. Wasserman said.

Data from this study were compared to historical controls reported by Turrisi et al (

N Engl J Med

340:265-271, 1999). That study compared esophagitis in 417 patients receiving BID vs QD radiation. 

The Turrisi study also found that BID radiation plus chemotherapy resulted in better survival.

Similar Esophagitis Rates

In the study reported by Dr. Wasserman, all patients completed radiation, and 26 had the four cycles of chemotherapy. Others had fewer cycles of chemotherapy because of toxicity.

Amifostine was well tolerated and toxicities attributable to it were mild. "We had one rash, a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction," Dr. Wasserman noted. "We had nausea and vomiting in 32%, and hypotension in 30%."

Esophagitis rates observed with amifostine were similar to those seen in the Turrisi study. "There appears to be no evidence of protection against esophagitis in this setting," Dr. Wasserman said. Complete and partial response rates were similar to the Turrisi study.

Recent Videos
With many treatments emerging in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer landscape, sequencing therapy has emerged as a key consideration for these patients.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
Related Content