Chemotherapy Plus Irinotecan, Paclitaxel, Carboplatin Shows Activity

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 9
Volume 10
Issue 9

CHICAGO-Preliminary results of a phase I trial of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan (Camptosar), paclitaxel (Taxol), and carboplatin (Paraplatin) showed that this approach is feasible and active in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), reported Ann M. Mauer, MD. The dose-limiting toxicity when combining these three drugs with concurrent chest radiotherapy was neutropenia, and weekly delivery of the regimen was not feasible at the originally planned doses. Dr. Mauer is assistant professor of medicine at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois.

CHICAGO—Preliminary results of a phase I trial of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan (Camptosar), paclitaxel (Taxol), and carboplatin (Paraplatin) showed that this approach is feasible and active in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), reported Ann M. Mauer, MD. The dose-limiting toxicity when combining these three drugs with concurrent chest radiotherapy was neutropenia, and weekly delivery of the regimen was not feasible at the originally planned doses. Dr. Mauer is assistant professor of medicine at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois.

"Both distant and locoregional treatment failures occur and contribute to mortality in stage III NSCLC. Consequently, combined-modality therapy with chemotherapy and radiation is now standard care. Newer agents have been incorporated into both induction chemotherapy and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens. The rationale for the combination used in our phase I trial is that carboplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan each demonstrates significant single-agent antitumor activity in NSCLC, that all three are radiosensitizers, and that they have non-overlapping toxicities," Dr. Mauer said.

Doses Had to Be Reduced

Twenty patients with histologically documented stage III NSCLC and no prior chemotherapy or chest radiotherapy were enrolled. The planned phase I treatment schema was induction chemotherapy with irinotecan/paclitaxel/carboplatin (Figure 1) followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan/paclitaxel/carboplatin/radiation (Figure 2). "A third step of surgery, if feasible, was added because some patient became resectable as a result of chemoradiotherapy," Dr. Mauer said.

"We had planned to dose-escalate irinotecan but had to reduce doses due to toxicity," Dr. Mauer said.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy at dose level I (irinotecan 30 mg/m²/wk, carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 2/wk, paclitaxel 45 mg/m²/wk)produced grade 3 neutropenia in three patients. Two had treatment delayed because they met the criteria for dose-limiting toxicity due to failure to achieve white blood cell and neutrophil recovery to less than or equal to grade 1 toxicity on the day of scheduled chemotherapy. Treatment at dose level II (irinotecan 30 mg/m²/wk, paclitaxel 45 mg/m²/wk) produced dose-limiting grade 3 neutropenia in three of six patients treated. Treatment at dose level III (irinotecan 30 mg/m²/wk, paclitaxel 40 mg/m²/wk) produced dose-limiting neutropenia in one of six patients treated.

Nonhematologic toxicities during chemoradiotherapy included esophagitis: grade 3 esophagitis in four of 16 patients, grade 2 in six patients, and grade 1 in six patients. Grade 3 pneumonitis occurred in one patient and grade 2 pneumonitis in one patient, both at dose level II.

Range of Responses

Dr. Mauer reported that five patients (20%) had partial responses following induction chemotherapy and 14 had stable disease. Three patients developed distant metastatic disease during this portion of treatment. Nine of 15 patients had partial responses noted following chemoradiotherapy, and six patients had stable disease. Two patients developed distant disease progression during this stage of treatment.

Three patients had tumors that became resectable following chemoradiotherapy. Dr. Mauer said that one of the these patients had a complete pathologic remission. Two had partial remissions, one of whom later developed brain metastases.

A phase II study of this regimen is underway in stage III NSCLC to define the response activity and to establish the pattern of failure.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.