A health insurer actually poses the big question

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 19 No 5
Volume 19
Issue 5

In today’s contentious debate over how to best deliver cost-effective, value-added healthcare, insurers have become the villain du jour, taking a backseat only to Wall Street fat cats.

In today's contentious debate over how to best deliver cost-effective, value-added healthcare, insurers have become the villain du jour, taking a backseat only to Wall Street fat cats. It's largely a bum rap. There are plenty of innovative insurers out there, bringing high-value coverage to their customers.

Most physicians contend that healthcare insurers have only one responsibility: Paying claims promptly and accurately. But according to a recent article in The Oncologist by Lee Newcomer, MD, insurers provide several more important roles; chief among them is creating risk-sharing pools and negotiating with providers to keep costs down for their customers. There is also another important role: parsing out ineffective treatments and drugs (15:32-35, supplement 1, 2010).

For instance, at United Healthcare, an internal study in 2005 showed that 12% of patients receiving trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy did not have HER2 overexpression, an astounding finding. By being aggressive about determining whether a treatment is actually necessary, correctly applied, or less effective than another therapy, innovative payers like Dr. Newcomer bring dollar value to the complex patient, provider, payer mix.

In his article Dr. Newcomer makes another extremely interesting and, considering the trend toward comparative effectiveness research, timely comment: "Unfortunately, insurers are all failing to perform the most important strategy for healthcare coverage-providing only effective therapies at a reasonable cost."

He goes on to address the one question that keeps players in healthcare reform up at night: "The entire healthcare industry needs to examine the value of the services offered to patients. It should ask the question-how do we get to the desired outcome at the best possible cost? That is the most important and heretofore unanswered question in the debate over healthcare reform."

Recent Videos
Conducting trials safely within a community setting lies at the heart of a successful collaboration between Northwell Health and START.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
The expertise of START's network may streamline the availability of clinical trial enrollment and novel treatment options among patients with cancer.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
A new START center in New York may give patients with advanced malignancies an opportunity to access novel therapies in the community setting.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
START is the largest early phase oncology network in the community-based setting, according to Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne, MD, MRCPI, PhD.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Related Content