Sunitinib prolongs PFS in RCC: update

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 8
Volume 16
Issue 8

An updated analysis from the pivotal phase III trial of sunitinib (Sutent) in 750 previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) has reaffirmed the superior efficacy of sunitinib, compared with interferon-alfa (IFN-a) and shown that the agent prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) across all patient groups

ASCO—An updated analysis from the pivotal phase III trial of sunitinib (Sutent) in 750 previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) has reaffirmed the superior efficacy of sunitinib, compared with interferon-alfa (IFN-a) and shown that the agent prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) across all patient groups, including those with the poorest prognoses. Sunitinib is a multikinase inhibitor that works by inhibiting angiogenesis and cell proliferation.

Lead investigator Robert Motzer, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), presented the results at the ASCO annual meeting 2007 (abstract 5024).

Previous reports with a data cut-off of November 2005, as determined by independent central review, showed median PFS of 11 months with sunitinib vs 5.0 months with IFN-a (HR 0.415). The updated median PFS results (data cutoff February 2007) were almost identical: 11 months for sunitinib vs 5.1 months for IFN-a (HR 0.538).

The new analysis showed that the PFS benefit with sunitinib vs IFN-a extended across all of the MSKCC risk status groups:

• Favorable risk (0 risk factors): 14.5 months vs 7.9 months with IFN-a.

• Intermediate risk (one to two risk factors): 10.6 months vs 3.8 months.

• Poor risk (three or more risk factors): 3.7 months vs 1.2 months.

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content