November 12th 2024
Camizestrant showed better progression-free survival than fulvestrant across various subgroups of patients with advanced breast cancer.
42nd Annual CFS: Innovative Cancer Therapy for Tomorrow®
November 13-15, 2024
Register Now!
Community Practice Connections™: 5th Annual Precision Medicine Symposium – An Illustrated Tumor Board
View More
Community Oncology Connections™: Controversies and Conversations About HER2-Expressing Breast Cancer… Advances in Management from HER2-Low to Positive Disease
View More
Community Oncology Connections™: Overcoming Barriers to Testing, Trial Access, and Equitable Care in Cancer
View More
42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference®
March 6 - 9, 2025
Register Now!
The Evolving Tool Box in Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: What You Need to Know About Next-Generation SERDs, PI3K/AKT, ADCs, CDK4/6 and Beyond…
View More
Coffee Talk™: Navigating the Impact of HER2/3, TROP2, and PARP from Early Stage to Advanced Breast Cancer Care
View More
Fighting Disparities and Saving Lives: An Exploration of Challenges and Solutions in Cancer Care
View More
Docetaxel and Herceptin Both Show Benefit in FinHer Trial
March 1st 2006Nine weeks of trastuzumab (Herceptin) given concurrently with single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere) or vinorelbine (Navelbine) prior to combination chemotherapy improves survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients, compared with no trastuzumab, with the docetaxel regimen having a slight advantage over vinorelbine.
Non-BRCA Hereditary Breast Cancer Linked to New Cancers
March 1st 2006The risk for a new cancer in the unaffected breast substantially increases in women diagnosed with unilateral, hereditary (non-BRCA) breast cancer, according to a new study. Published in the March 15, 2006, issue of Cancer, the study reveals that women under age 50 diagnosed with hereditary (non-BRCA) breast cancer are at significantly greater risk for developing cancer in the other breast. Adjuvant hormonal therapy, however, reduces contralateral breast cancer risk.
Intraductal Chemo Promising in Breast Ca Model
March 1st 2006Investigators at Johns Hopkins University Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center have begun phase I studies of intraductal chemotherapy in women with breast cancer scheduled for mastectomy. The chemotherapy agent is injected via hair-thin catheters into the milk ducts.
No Added Benefit of RT Hyperfractionation for LABC Pts
February 1st 2006In patients with noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), hyperfractionated radiation of the chest wall does not improve clinical outcomes relative to conventional radiation, according to long-term results of a trial presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (abstract 2008).
Dr. Slamon Describes Past, Present, Future of Targeted Rx
February 1st 2006Discussing decades of work in developing trastuzumab (Herceptin), and looking to the future based on techniques that led to the understanding of HER2/neu, Dennis J. Slamon, MD, PhD, presented the William L. McGuire Memorial Lecture at the 28th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Dr. Slamon is director of clinical and translational research at the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Surgical Breast Biopsy Has High Reexcision Rate
February 1st 2006Surgical biopsy for the initial evaluation of breast lesions should be discouraged, according to Stephen D. Edge, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, who presented a study comparing biopsy techniques at the 28th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium .
Adjuvant TC Superior to AC in Early-Stage Breast Ca
February 1st 2006Use of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel (Taxotere) and cyclophosphamide (TC) is associated with a 33% improvement in disease-free survival and trend for improvement in overall survival in early-stage breast cancer, compared with the standard doxorubicin (Adriamycin)/cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen, according to the final analysis of a study from US Oncology Research, Houston
Femara Approved as Adjuvant Rx for Early Breast Cancer
February 1st 2006Femara (letrozole, Novartis) has received FDA approval for use in treating early breast cancer in postmenopausal women following surgery. The agency based its approval on findings from the BIG I-98 study, the only trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of Femara vs tamoxifen when used as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early disease.
Avastin Benefits Metastatic Breast Cancer
January 1st 2006Bevacizumab (Avastin), a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), conferred additional benefit to paclitaxel when the combination was used as first-line therapy in locally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer patients in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase III E2100 study.
Better Prognosis for ‘Elsewhere' Local Breast Ca Recurrences
January 1st 2006When breast cancer recurs locally after breast-conserving therapy, prognosis is better for patients whose recurrence is "elsewhere" in the breast than for those whose recurrence is in the primary tumor bed, new research shows. However, regardless of the type, control of the local recurrence is the most significant predictor of subsequent distant metastasis and survival.
Herceptin/Taxotere Ups DFS in Early HER2+ Breast Ca
January 1st 2006The first interim results from the BCIRG 006 phase III trial showed that trastuzumab (Herceptin) combined with docetaxel (Taxotere)-based regimens significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) in early HER2-positive breast cancer. Genetic studies further delineated a subgroup of patients for whom truly targeted therapy may be applied in the future.
Taxanes Comparable as Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer; Weekly Paclitaxel More Effective Than q3wk
January 1st 2006Docetaxel (Taxotere) and paclitaxel (Taxol) produced similar outcomes in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in the North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E1199. Joseph Sparano, MD, profesor of medicine, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, presented the results as a late-breaking abstract at the 28th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (abstract 48).
Lessons From Ongoing Clinical Experience With MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy
January 1st 2006Accumulating clinical experience with MammoSite breast brachytherapy is supporting its safety, efficacy, and good cosmetic outcomes, while also providing lessons to improve its use, according to a pair of studies presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Trial of Tykerb for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Mets Begins
January 1st 2006SAN ANTONIO—GlaxoSmithKline has announced the initiation of a global multicenter phase II trial (known as EGF 105084) to evaluate Tykerb (lapatinib) for the treatment of ErbB2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer that has metastasized to the brain. Tykerb is an orally bioavailable small molecule that potently inhibits two receptors, ErbB2 and ErbB1. It is currently in development as a first-line treatment for ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer.
Encouraging Results With Ixabepilone in Metastatic Breast Ca
January 1st 2006Recent clinical studies from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) show that the macrolide analog ixabepilone (BMS-247550) is effective in treating metastatic breast cancer, is less susceptible to resistance than paclitaxel, and is associated with much lower rates of peripheral neuropathy than the taxanes.
RT Proves Beneficial Even in Favorable Early Breast Cancer
January 1st 2006Radiation therapy (RT) reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence even in women with favorable early disease, researchers reported at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (abstract 3). Although recurrence was uncommon with combined breast-conserving surgery and hormonal therapy, it was one-half less common when whole-breast radiation therapy was further added to treatment.
Twenty Years of Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer
January 1st 2006The past 2 decades of systemic therapy for breast cancer have beena period of monumental change, in terms of both theory and technology.Adjuvant therapy developed from two strands of research-one insystemic chemotherapy and one in hormonal therapy-both of whichwere aided by the application of higher statistical methodology to clinicaltrials. The agent with the single greatest public health impact inoncology has been tamoxifen, but problems with tamoxifen therapy ledto the development of the aromatase inhibitors, and further researchled to the use of hormonal therapy in a chemopreventive capacity. Theevolution of systemic chemotherapy for breast cancer has been an interplaybetween theory-driven approaches and new agents. By the late1980s, accumulating data revealed that overexpression of HER2 (erbB2)played an important role in a substantial portion of breast cancers,which prompted the development of trastuzumab (Herceptin), an agenttargeting HER2-positive disease. Determining HER2 status proved essentialto assessing patient eligibility for trastuzumab therapy. Decodingof the human genome and application of bioinformatics furtherrevolutionized the possibilities in breast cancer treatment.
Commentary (Hudis): Twenty Years of Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer
January 1st 2006After peaking in 1990, the absolutenumber of deaths peryear attributed to breast cancerhas fallen steadily.[1] This declineoccurred despite trends thatwould seem to increase breast cancermortality (population growth, aging,increased obesity) and was mirroredeven in countries lacking routine supportfor mammography. Systemictherapy is at least partly responsiblefor this mortality decline, and in supportof this conclusion the predictedbenefits (based on trials and metaanalyses)have been seen in population-based studies.[2] In this issue ofONCOLOGY, Mina and Sledge providea timely and inspiring review of2 decades of progress in systemic therapyfor breast cancer. This leads toseveral questions, including: How didwe get here and what is next?
Commentary (Wolff/Davidson): Twenty Years of Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer
January 1st 2006Over a 30-year period in the20th century, human flightevolved from the propeller tothe jet engine and then managed tosend us to the moon and back. Thechanges over the past 30 years in ourunderstanding of the biology of breastcancer and its application to treatmentare no less startling. Since 1975, wehave witnessed an astounding evolutionin our strategies to prevent,[1]diagnose,[2] and manage[3] a diseasethat affects the lives of so many in theUnited States[4] and around theworld.[5] These efforts have generatedmany headlines and an occasionalstumble. Nonetheless, they have hada dramatic impact on the lives of millionsof people, and it is hoped thatthe rate of improvement will furtheraccelerate in years to come.
Commentary (Sachelarie et al): Optimizing Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
December 1st 2005Drs. Perez and Muss provide acomprehensive review of therole of adjuvant chemotherapyin the management of breast cancerpatients. The benefits of anthracyclinevs nonanthracycline regimens are discussed,the taxanes are reviewed indetail, and data regarding dose intensity,dose density, and optimal numberof chemotherapy cycles areexplored. Data on newer agents andbiologic agents also are presented.Debate continues regarding the subsetsof patients who will derive thegreatest benefit from chemotherapyand which regimen is most appropriate.While the review indicates theefficacy of several regimens as definedby randomized clinical trials, itdoes not emphasize patient-specificfactors in determining the optimaltherapy for a given patient.
Commentary (Brown/Stearns): Optimizing Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
December 1st 2005Improvements in early diagnosisand treatment of breast cancer overthe past few decades have clearlyreduced disease-related mortality. The2000 Oxford Overview published recentlyby the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’Cooperative Group (EBCTCG)highlights some of the widely practicableadjuvant drug treatments thatwere under investigation in the 1980s,and have substantially reduced 5-yearrecurrence rates as well as 15-yearmortality rates.[1] Optimal adjuvanthormone therapy is associated with asubstantial improvement of diseaseoutcomes in hormone receptor–positivewomen. Chemotherapy is alsoassociated with considerable benefitsin women with breast cancer, regardlessof age, stage, or hormone receptorstatus. However, chemotherapy isnot without risks. The treatment isassociated with many adverse eventsthat may significantly affect a patient’squality of life while she is receivingtreatment. Other effects may be longstanding,permanent, and, rarely, lifethreatening.
Commentary (Buzdar): Optimizing Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
December 1st 2005This review of adjuvant chemotherapyby Perez and Muss isconcise and complete. For themost part, the authors present the datain a balanced way. The role of adjuvantchemotherapy has been establishedin breast cancer. Appropriateutilization of adjuvant chemotherapycan significantly reduce the risk ofdisease recurrence and improve survival.These benefits are associatedwith adjuvant chemotherapy regardlessof the age of the patient, nodalstatus, or hormonal status of cancer.
Optimizing Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
December 1st 2005Mortality in breast cancer has declined in the past decade, owing toadvances in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments.Adjuvant chemotherapy has had a major effect on increasing survivalin women with locoregional breast cancer. Like all treatments, adjuvantchemotherapy is a work in progress, and it has evolved from singleoral agents to complex multidrug regimens. The choice of regimens isnot without controversy, however, and several have been shown to bemore effective than others, especially in patients who are at high riskfor recurrence. The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel (Taxotere) havebeen shown to be effective in the adjuvant setting, and they have alsobeen shown to improve the outcomes in node-positive disease. Bothdisease-free and overall survival are greater with doxorubicin,paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide given in a dose-dense, every-2-weekschedule with growth factor support than with the same agents givenin an every-3-week schedule. Disease-free and overall survival in patientswith node-positive disease are greater with docetaxel, doxorubicin(Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide (TAC) than with fluorouracil,doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC). Febrile neutropenia iscommon with the TAC regimen, but it can be minimized with growthfactor support. Based on these findings, dose-dense therapy and TAC arethe current adjuvant treatments of choice in patients with node-positivedisease; other, less-intense regimens may be appropriate in patientswith lower-risk disease. Ongoing trials are investigating the efficacy ofcommonly used regimens, new chemotherapeutic and biologic agents,and novel doses and schedules of currently available agents.
Low-Fat Diet May Reduce Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk
November 1st 2005ORLANDO-Decreasing breast cancer survivors’ dietary fat reduced the rate of disease recurrence by 24%, according to a study presented by Rowan T. Chlebowski, MD, PhD, at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 41st Annual Meeting (abstract 10). "A lifestyle intervention resulting in dietary fat reduction may increase relapse-free survival in a population of mostly postmenopausal breast cancer patients," said Dr. Chlebowski, chief, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
Commentary (Hwang/Esserman): Surgical Management of Hepatic Breast Cancer Metastases
November 1st 2005In this review of hepatic resectionfor metastatic breast cancer, theauthors argue that a small groupof women with isolated liver metastasesmay be appropriate candidates forsurgical resection. Although some datahave been reported, the few publishedstudies represent small, retrospectivesingle-institutional series with no standardizedcriteria for resection. Nevertheless,the potential prospect ofimproved patient outcome in the settingof liver metastases from breastcancer deserves further consideration.
Optimizing Outcomes in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: The Molecular Rationale
November 1st 2005The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor HER2 is a transmembranereceptor tyrosine kinase that plays a crucial role in the regulationof cell proliferation and survival. The overexpression of HER2correlates strongly with prognosis in breast cancer. The targeted blockadeof HER2 activity with monoclonal antibodies (eg, trastuzumab[Herceptin]) and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (eg,lapatinib) results in the inhibition of tumor growth in HER2-positivecancers. Anti-HER2 therapies have also shown efficacy in combinationwith chemotherapy in clinical trials in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Their efficacy may, however, be limited bymolecular mechanisms that compensate for HER2 suppression (eg,activity of EGF receptor) or mechanisms of resistance (eg, loss ofPTEN). HER2 continues, however, to be overexpressed by the cancercells, and the continued suppression of HER2 may be required formaximum antitumor effect. It should be noted that in the absence ofdefinitive data from randomized trials showing an absence or presenceof benefit, the use of anti-HER2 agents such as trastuzumab in multiplesequential regimens has become the standard of care. CombiningHER2 blockers with agents that overcome the compensatory or resistancemechanisms may increase the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapies.In addition, anti-HER2 therapies can have synergy with common chemotherapyregimens and remain effective through multiple lines oftherapy. Optimizing the use of therapies that target HER2 signalingwill lead to further advances in the treatment of breast cancer.
Commentary (Kooby): Surgical Management of Hepatic Breast Cancer Metastases
November 1st 2005Podnos and Wagman provide acomprehensive review of surgicalresection for hepatic breastcancer metastases. The authors presentthe disparate data accrued by variouscenters in the United States, Europe,and Asia, and then attempt to consolidatethese experiences to draw conclusionsand provide guidelines. Thisreview is well-written, thorough, andinteresting; however, as with anyreview of a topic devoid of level 1evidence, the authors raise more questionsthan answers.