Multiple Myeloma

Early results from the iMMagine-1 trial show anito-cel as a promising therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Data from the phase 3 AQUILA study support the applications for subcutaneous daratumumab in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

This case highlights the importance of early recognition and management of pleural effusion in patients with multiple myeloma and underscores the need for further research into optimal management strategies and underlying mechanisms.

Panelists discuss how comprehensive long-term monitoring protocols for patients who have received bispecific therapy typically involve regular follow-ups, standardized testing schedules, and clear communication channels between academic centers and community practices to manage potential complications and adverse events.

Panelists discuss how key areas for improvement in the application of GPRC5D-targeted therapies in real-world settings include optimizing patient selection, addressing logistical challenges, and enhancing adverse event management.

Panelists discuss how determining a patient's readiness to transition back to community oncology care after bispecific therapy involves assessing multiple factors including treatment response, toxicity resolution, overall stability, and the community practice's capabilities.

Panelists discuss how additional resources such as enhanced staff training, financial support, and improved patient education could benefit the implementation of bispecific therapies in community settings.

Panelists discuss how prophylactic use of tocilizumab in the MajesTEC-1 trial may reduce the incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in patients receiving bispecific antibody therapy for multiple myeloma, potentially improving treatment safety and tolerability.

Panelists discuss how the follow-up results from the RedirecTT-1 study provide insights into the long-term efficacy and safety of bispecific antibody combinations in treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, potentially shaping future treatment approaches for this challenging disease.

Panelists discuss how patient-specific factors like age, comorbidities, cytogenetic risk status, and personal preferences guide decisions to deviate from standard protocols, with particular attention to frailty scores and organ function when considering treatment intensity.

Panelists discuss how the CARTITUDE-4 trial results show cilta-cel's superior efficacy over standard of care therapies in treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, potentially reshaping treatment paradigms for this patient population.

Panelists discuss how the KarMMa-3 trial results demonstrate superior efficacy of ide-cel compared to standard of care therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, potentially establishing a new benchmark for treatment in this setting.

Patients treated with BCMA-directed immunotherapies for myeloma may experience susceptibility to severe infections following treatment.

Panelists discuss how referral types for multiple myeloma patients vary widely, including newly diagnosed cases, relapsed/refractory disease, and specific therapy considerations like bispecifics, with processes differing between in-state and out-of-state referrals due to logistical and insurance factors.

Panelists discuss how the use of GPRC5D-targeted therapies impacts healthcare resource utilization in the community setting, including potential changes in hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and supportive care needs.

Panelists discuss how the evaluation and treatment initiation processes for non-BCMA targeted bispecifics and BCMA-targeted bispecifics share core similarities in patient assessment and care coordination, but differ in specific premedication protocols, dosing strategies, and side effect management.

Panelists discuss how logistical barriers like drug access, insurance coverage, and managing infusion logistics have posed challenges in the implementation of GPRC5D-targeted therapies in community practice.

BCMA testing tracks clinical changes faster without the need for marker expression vs monoclonal immunoglobulin, a conventional multiple myeloma marker.

Studies indicate that higher BCMA levels are associated with a greater need for therapy years following diagnosis for patients with smoldering myeloma.

Panelists discuss how the TRIMM-2 study explores the potential of combining bispecific antibodies to enhance treatment efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, potentially offering a novel therapeutic strategy for this difficult-to-treat condition.

Panelists discuss how Talquetamab, a novel GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, shows promising results in treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma based on the MonumenTAL-1 trial data, potentially offering a new therapeutic option for this challenging patient population.

Two cases of patients with multiple myeloma and kidney failure successfully underwent CAR T-cell therapy using ciltacabtagene autoleucel.

James R. Berenson, MD, discusses serum BCMA and markers for predicting outcomes and monitoring disease in patients with multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how VRd (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) remains the standard frontline regimen for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, though some now consider adding daratumumab (dara-VRd) in high-risk cases.

Panelists discuss how ide-cel, a CAR T-cell therapy, demonstrates promising real-world outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, potentially offering a valuable treatment option for this challenging patient population.

Panelists discuss how novel therapeutic approaches and combination regimens are reshaping the landscape of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, offering new hope for improved outcomes and quality of life.

A panel of experts in multiple myeloma discussed strategies for monitoring and mitigating adverse effects associated with GPRC5D-targeting bispecific agents.

Panelists discuss how community practices establish protocols and processes for ongoing monitoring and management of potential long-term complications or adverse events from bispecific therapy.

Panelists discuss how academic centers approach the initial consultation and evaluation process for patients referred for bispecific therapy from community practices.

Panelists discuss how transitioning patients with multiple myeloma from community to academic settings faces challenges including communication gaps, differences in treatment approaches, patient reluctance, and logistical hurdles.