Multiple Myeloma

Data from a multiple myeloma mouse xenograft model demonstrated promising tumor regression activity from OPN-6602 monotherapy and in combination with standard of care agents.

During the 66th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition, experts in multiple myeloma gathered to discuss the impact of maintenance therapy and minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with newly diagnosed transplant-eligible or -ineligible multiple myeloma.

Updated CARTITUDE-4 trial data show cilta-cel induces deep MRD negativity in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.

Efficacy results from the phase 1/2 LINKER-MM1 trial evaluating linvoseltamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma support the decision.

Hematologists gathered to discuss recent updates on bispecific antibodies surrounding patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

A retrospective systemic literature review showed that increased lines of therapy led to decreased HRQOL in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma.

Findings from RedirecTT-1 show responses across different dose levels of talquetamab/teclistamab among those with multiple myeloma.

Clonal hematopoiesis may be associated with the early development of toxic events in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Real-world data show that closer monitoring may be necessary for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and baseline renal impairment.

This segment highlights clinical experiences with ide-cel in the second-line setting, focusing on observed improvements in efficacy and quality of life, as well as challenges in administration

Panelists discuss how the CEPHEUS study comparing subcutaneous daratumumab plus VRd vs VRd alone in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) provides important insights into the role of quadruplet therapy in this specific population.

Panelists discuss how UCSF Health has learned that successful integration of CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma requires multidisciplinary collaboration, patient selection optimization, and management of toxicities. Future research includes exploring CAR T-cell therapy in earlier treatment lines and combining it with novel agents to enhance efficacy.

Panelists discuss collaborating with community practices on CAR T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma through joint clinical trials, patient education programs, and shared data initiatives. These partnerships enhance treatment access, foster innovation, and improve patient outcomes across diverse settings.

Panelists discuss how the evolving treatment landscape for patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is being shaped by emerging data on optimal treatment sequencing strategies, both in frontline settings and subsequent lines of therapy.

Having extramedullary disease correlated with worse PFS and OS among patients who received belantamab mafodotin for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how recent findings from the GMMG-HD7 trial comparing isatuximab-RVd vs RVd have shaped treatment decision-making in patients with multiple myeloma by providing comparative efficacy and safety data between the 2 regimens.

Panelists discuss how the choice between isatuximab-based quadruplet and daratumumab-based regimens in multiple myeloma treatment depends on clinical trial data comparing Isa-KRd vs KRd, with particular emphasis on efficacy outcomes and patient-specific factors that might influence treatment selection.

Complete response rate strongly correlated with lower SLiM-CRAB incidence and biochemical progression in those with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

Patients who received the isatuximab combination in the IMROZ trial experienced prolonged MRD-negativity, which correlated with improved PFS.

Panelists discuss a clinical scenario involving a 56-year-old male man with myeloma and del 17p deletion, treated with RVD induction, auto transplant, and lenalidomide maintenance, who relapsed after 2 years and is now referred to discuss chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) CAR-T versus vs standard therapy, sharing key takeaways and pearls from the case.

Panelists discuss successful collaborations between academic centers and community practices in the context of (chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma, key lessons learned in integrating CAR T therapy into the treatment landscape, and future plans for expanding CAR T therapy’s role in earlier lines of multiple myeloma treatment.

Panelists discuss their institution’s approach to co-management and co-monitoring of (chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) -T patients, strategies to facilitate seamless transitions of care between academic centers and community practices, common challenges in the CAR -T referral process and solutions, and advice for community physicians on the timing and preparation for patient referrals.

Panelists discuss how challenges in the CAR T referral process include delayed referrals, patient logistics, and managing expectations. One institution addresses these through streamlined communication, patient education, and clear referral guidelines. Community physicians should refer early on, ensure candidacy, and collaborate closely to optimize outcomes.

Panelists discuss how, a collaborative approach to co-managing and co-monitoring patients receiving CAR-TCAR T-cell therapy patients, ensuring continuity of care as they transition to community settings. We They employ detailed care plans, electronic health records integration, and regular follow-ups with community providers to facilitate seamless transitions.

Panelists discuss how CAR T-cell therapy involves engineering a patient’s T cells to target cancer cells. The process includes cell collection, genetic modification, expansion, and reinfusion and streamlines the process with integrated workflows. Bridging therapy is provided in-house to treat patients awaiting CAR-T infusion.

Panelists discuss how the typical CAR T-cell therapy referral process begins with community physicians contacting the treatment center. The patient undergoes a thorough evaluation, including medical history, eligibility criteria, and pretreatment assessments before final selection for therapy.

Additionally, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology and Chinese Anti-Cancer Association guidelines recommend the isatuximab regimen for this population.

Panelists discuss how the AURIGA trial demonstrates superior outcomes with daratumumab plus lenalidomide maintenance compared with lenalidomide alone after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma while examining key subgroup analyses that inform treatment decisions regarding posttransplant maintenance therapy selection.

Panelists discuss how while daratumumab-based quadruplet regimens are increasingly becoming the standard of care for patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TE NDMM) due to superior efficacy data, certain factors like frailty, comorbidities, and cost considerations may still warrant triplet therapy in select cases.

Panelists discuss how, when considering earlier lines of CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, key institutional factors include patient fitness/age, cytogenetic risk status, prior therapy response duration, and BCMA expression levels. Manufacturing timelines, financial considerations, and center-specific outcomes data also influence timing decisions. For patients receiving early-line CAR T therapy, subsequent treatment options typically focus on novel agent combinations or clinical trials exploring additional cellular therapies, with choices guided by response duration to CAR T and the patient’s individual disease characteristics and treatment goals.