Multiple Myeloma

>

Latest News

The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 76.4% and 68.2%, respectively, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who discontinued treatment with teclistamab early.
Discontinuing Teclistamab Early Yields Comparable Efficacy vs Continuous Therapy in RRMM

December 11th 2025

The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 76.4% and 68.2%, respectively, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who discontinued treatment with teclistamab early.

Most CRS events were low grade with elranatamab plus daratumumab and lenalidomide without prophylactic tocilizumab in patients with multiple myeloma.
Tumor Burden Does Not Impact CRS Risk With Elranatamab Combo in Myeloma

December 10th 2025

Data from the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study support continued investigation of talquetamab/pomalidomide in the phase 3 MonumenTAL-6 trial.
Talquetamab/Pomalidomide Shows Deep Responses in R/R Multiple Myeloma

December 10th 2025

Belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone led to a median PFS of 32.6 months in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Belantamab Mafodotin Combo Sustains MRD Negativity/PFS in Multiple Myeloma

December 10th 2025

Of the 4 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who received KLN-1010, 1 complete response and 3 partial responses were achieved at varying levels of MRD sensitivity.
Investigational BCMA CAR-T Yields Responses/Safety in R/R Multiple Myeloma

December 9th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

New Treatments for Multiple Myeloma

December 1st 2005

In 2004, multiple myeloma was diagnosed in more than 15,000 peoplein the United States and will account for approximately 20% of deathsdue to hematologic malignancies. Although traditional therapies suchas melphalan (Alkeran)/prednisone, combination chemotherapy withVAD (vincristine, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], and dexamethasone), andhigh-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation have shownsome success, median survival remains between 3 to 5 years. Treatmentoptions for patients with multiple myeloma have increased in recentyears, with the promise of improvement in survival. New agents, suchas the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Velcade), the antiangiogenicand immunomodulator thalidomide (Thalomid) and its analogs, suchas lenalidomide (Revlimid), together with other small molecules, includingarsenic trioxide (Trisenox), and other targeted therapies, havebeen studied alone and in combination with other antineoplastic therapies,either as induction therapy prior to stem cell transplantation or inpatients with relapsed disease. Bortezomib recently was approved inthe United States for the treatment of multiple myeloma in patientswho have received at least one prior therapy. The use of bortezomibbasedregimens as front-line therapy as well as the use of other agentsin multiple myeloma remain under investigation, and approvals forboth thalidomide and lenalidomide are hoped for soon, with the overallprospect of patient outcome continuing to be increasingly positive.


Site Logo

Tandem Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

March 1st 2003

The use of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cellsupport in the past decade has changed the outlook for patients withmultiple myeloma. In newly diagnosed patients, complete remissionrates of 25% to 50% can be achieved, with median disease-free andoverall survivals exceeding 3 and 5 years, respectively. Despite theseresults, autologous transplantation has not changed the ultimatelyfatal outcome of the disease, as there is no substantial evidence of“cure” in most published studies. An additional high-dose chemotherapycourse (with tandem transplants) appears to improve progressionfreesurvival, although the effect is not discernible until 3 to 5 yearsposttransplant. The recent reports of tandem autologous transplant formaximum cytoreduction followed by nonmyeloablative allogeneictransplant for eradication of minimal residual disease appears promisingand deserve further investigation. A central issue of tandemtransplants, whether they involve autologous or allogeneic transplants,revolves around defining the subsets of patients who will benefitfrom the procedure. Good-risk patients (defined by normal cytogeneticsand low beta-2–microglobulin levels), especially those who achievea complete or near-complete response after the first transplant, appearto benefit the most from a second cycle. High-risk patients (defined bychromosomal abnormalities usually involving chromosomes 11 and 13and high beta-2–microglobulin levels) whose median survival aftertandem transplant is less than 2 years should be offered novel therapeuticinterventions such as tandem “auto/allo” transplants. Until theefficacy and safety of this procedure is fully established, it should belimited to high-risk patients.