Multiple Myeloma

This segment examines the evidence supporting cilta-cel in second-line therapy, highlighting key outcomes from the CARTITUDE trials and comparing them to other available second-line treatment options for multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how the treatment landscape for patients with transplant-ineligible/deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is expected to evolve, with considerations for optimizing therapeutic approaches based on emerging data from novel drug combinations and treatment strategies.

Panelists discuss how frailty assessment influences treatment decisions in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), particularly examining the IFM2017-03 study’s evaluation of a dexamethasone-sparing approach using daratumumab plus lenalidomide in frail patients.

Efficacy results from the phase 1/2 LINKER-MM1 trial evaluating linvoseltamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma support the decision.

Hematologists gathered to discuss recent updates on bispecific antibodies surrounding patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

A retrospective systemic literature review showed that increased lines of therapy led to decreased HRQOL in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma.

This segment highlights the treatment journey of a 68-year-old IT professional with high-risk multiple myeloma, detailing progression after initial D-RVd therapy, refusal of ASCT, and successful transition to cilta-cel CAR-T therapy with manageable adverse events.

This segment discusses the process and critical importance of bridging strategies for patients awaiting CAR T-cell therapy.

Panelists discuss how isatuximab- and daratumumab-based quadruplet regimens compare in patients with transplant-ineligible/deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), with a particular focus on minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity data from the IMROZ and CEPHEUS trials, presented at the 2024 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition.

Panelists discuss how treatment strategies and sequencing decisions for patients with multiple myeloma who decline transplantation despite eligibility must be carefully tailored, considering both immediate therapeutic goals and potential future treatment options.

Findings from RedirecTT-1 show responses across different dose levels of talquetamab/teclistamab among those with multiple myeloma.

Clonal hematopoiesis may be associated with the early development of toxic events in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Real-world data show that closer monitoring may be necessary for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and baseline renal impairment.

This segment examines the decision-making process between CAR-T therapy and other innovative treatments, exploring scenarios where alternative therapies may be more appropriate.

This segment highlights clinical experiences with ide-cel in the second-line setting, focusing on observed improvements in efficacy and quality of life, as well as challenges in administration

Panelists discuss how the CEPHEUS study comparing subcutaneous daratumumab plus VRd vs VRd alone in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) provides important insights into the role of quadruplet therapy in this specific population.

Panelists discuss how UCSF Health has learned that successful integration of CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma requires multidisciplinary collaboration, patient selection optimization, and management of toxicities. Future research includes exploring CAR T-cell therapy in earlier treatment lines and combining it with novel agents to enhance efficacy.

Panelists discuss collaborating with community practices on CAR T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma through joint clinical trials, patient education programs, and shared data initiatives. These partnerships enhance treatment access, foster innovation, and improve patient outcomes across diverse settings.

Panelists discuss how the evolving treatment landscape for patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is being shaped by emerging data on optimal treatment sequencing strategies, both in frontline settings and subsequent lines of therapy.

Having extramedullary disease correlated with worse PFS and OS among patients who received belantamab mafodotin for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Panelists discuss how recent findings from the GMMG-HD7 trial comparing isatuximab-RVd vs RVd have shaped treatment decision-making in patients with multiple myeloma by providing comparative efficacy and safety data between the 2 regimens.

Panelists discuss how the choice between isatuximab-based quadruplet and daratumumab-based regimens in multiple myeloma treatment depends on clinical trial data comparing Isa-KRd vs KRd, with particular emphasis on efficacy outcomes and patient-specific factors that might influence treatment selection.

Complete response rate strongly correlated with lower SLiM-CRAB incidence and biochemical progression in those with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

Patients who received the isatuximab combination in the IMROZ trial experienced prolonged MRD-negativity, which correlated with improved PFS.

Panelists discuss a clinical scenario involving a 56-year-old male man with myeloma and del 17p deletion, treated with RVD induction, auto transplant, and lenalidomide maintenance, who relapsed after 2 years and is now referred to discuss chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) CAR-T versus vs standard therapy, sharing key takeaways and pearls from the case.

Panelists discuss successful collaborations between academic centers and community practices in the context of (chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma, key lessons learned in integrating CAR T therapy into the treatment landscape, and future plans for expanding CAR T therapy’s role in earlier lines of multiple myeloma treatment.

Panelists discuss their institution’s approach to co-management and co-monitoring of (chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) -T patients, strategies to facilitate seamless transitions of care between academic centers and community practices, common challenges in the CAR -T referral process and solutions, and advice for community physicians on the timing and preparation for patient referrals.

Panelists discuss how challenges in the CAR T referral process include delayed referrals, patient logistics, and managing expectations. One institution addresses these through streamlined communication, patient education, and clear referral guidelines. Community physicians should refer early on, ensure candidacy, and collaborate closely to optimize outcomes.

Panelists discuss how, a collaborative approach to co-managing and co-monitoring patients receiving CAR-TCAR T-cell therapy patients, ensuring continuity of care as they transition to community settings. We They employ detailed care plans, electronic health records integration, and regular follow-ups with community providers to facilitate seamless transitions.

Panelists discuss how CAR T-cell therapy involves engineering a patient’s T cells to target cancer cells. The process includes cell collection, genetic modification, expansion, and reinfusion and streamlines the process with integrated workflows. Bridging therapy is provided in-house to treat patients awaiting CAR-T infusion.