Multiple Myeloma

>

Latest News

The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 76.4% and 68.2%, respectively, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who discontinued treatment with teclistamab early.
Discontinuing Teclistamab Early Yields Comparable Efficacy vs Continuous Therapy in RRMM

December 11th 2025

The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 76.4% and 68.2%, respectively, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who discontinued treatment with teclistamab early.

Most CRS events were low grade with elranatamab plus daratumumab and lenalidomide without prophylactic tocilizumab in patients with multiple myeloma.
Tumor Burden Does Not Impact CRS Risk With Elranatamab Combo in Myeloma

December 10th 2025

Data from the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study support continued investigation of talquetamab/pomalidomide in the phase 3 MonumenTAL-6 trial.
Talquetamab/Pomalidomide Shows Deep Responses in R/R Multiple Myeloma

December 10th 2025

Belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone led to a median PFS of 32.6 months in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Belantamab Mafodotin Combo Sustains MRD Negativity/PFS in Multiple Myeloma

December 10th 2025

Of the 4 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who received KLN-1010, 1 complete response and 3 partial responses were achieved at varying levels of MRD sensitivity.
Investigational BCMA CAR-T Yields Responses/Safety in R/R Multiple Myeloma

December 9th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

New Questions About Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

September 1st 2006

Multiple myeloma is now the most common indication for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in North America, with over 5,000 transplants performed yearly (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] data). While the role of ASCT as initial therapy in multiple myeloma has been established by randomized studies, newer therapies are challenging the traditional paradigm. The availability of novel induction agents and newer risk stratification tools, and the increasing recognition of durability of remissions are changing the treatment paradigm. However, even with arduous therapy designed to produce more complete remissions—for example, tandem autologous transplants—we have seen no plateau in survival curves. A tandem autologous procedure followed by maintenance therapy may be performed in an attempt to sustain remission. Sequential autologous transplants followed by nonmyeloablative allotransplants are pursued with the hope of "curing" multiple myeloma. We examine how the key challenges of increasing the response rates and maintaining responses are being addressed using more effective induction and/or consolidation treatments and the need for maintenance therapies after ASCT. We argue that given the biologic heterogeneity of multiple myeloma, risk-adapted transplant approaches are warranted. While the role of curative-intent, dose-intense toxic therapy is still controversial, conventional myeloablative allogeneic transplants need to be reexamined as an option in high-risk aggressive myeloma, given improvements in supportive care and transplant-related mortality.