Ovarian Cancer

>

Latest News

Investigators of the OVATION-2 trial assessed IMNN-001, a novel IL-2 gene therapy, in patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.
PFS, OS Numerically Improve Via IMNN-001 Combo in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

June 4th 2025

Investigators of the OVATION-2 trial assessed IMNN-001, a novel IL-2 gene therapy, in patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.

Data from the ROSELLA trial may support relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel as a new standard in this ovarian cancer population.
Relacorilant and Nab-Paclitaxel Significantly Extend PFS in Ovarian Cancer

June 2nd 2025

Dostarlimab/Chemo, Maintenance Niraparib Show Modest Improvements in Ovarian Cancer
Dostarlimab/Chemo, Maintenance Niraparib Show Modest Improvements in Ovarian Cancer

June 2nd 2025

The safety profile of pembrolizumab in the KEYNOTE-B96 study was comparable with prior reports of the agent, and investigators observed no new safety signals.
Pembrolizumab Combo Extends PFS in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

May 15th 2025

Findings from the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial support the FDA approval of avutometinib plus defactinib in low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to Avutometinib/Defactinib in KRAS+ LGSOC

May 8th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

Community Practice Connections™: Pre-Conference Workshop on Immune Cell-Based Therapy

View More

Coffee Talk™: Navigating the Impact of HER2/3, TROP2, and PARP from Early Stage to Advanced Breast Cancer Care

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 9th Annual School of Gastrointestinal Oncology®

View More

Exploring the Benefits and Risks of AI in Oncology

View More

BURST CME™: Illuminating the Crossroads of Precision Medicine and Targeted Treatment Options in Metastatic CRC

View More

Go To PER in Chicago

May 30, 2025 - June 3, 2025

Register Now!

Fighting Disparities and Saving Lives: An Exploration of Challenges and Solutions in Cancer Care

View More

26th Annual International Lung Cancer Congress®

July 25-26, 2025

Register Now!

Medical Crossfire® in Adjunctive Testing: Charting a New Course in Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 14th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting

View More

Contextualizing Advances in Relapse Refractory DLBCL: Navigating Biomarkers, Emerging Data, and Adverse Event Management to Transform Patient Care

View More

Burst CME™: Tackling Adverse Events With Targeted Therapies for Diffuse B-Cell Lymphoma

View More

Biomarkers in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Empowering Treatment Decisions to Improve Outcomes

View More

Treating Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Current Options and Emerging Approaches

View More

BURST Expert Illustrations and Commentaries™: Exploring the Mechanistic Rationale for CSF-1R– Directed Treatment in Chronic GVHD

View More

(CME) Optimizing Management of Ocular Toxicity in Cancer Patients: The Role of Ophthalmologists in the Spectrum of Care

View More

(COPE) Optimizing Management of Ocular Toxicity in Cancer Patients: The Role of Ophthalmologists in the Spectrum of Care

View More

20th Annual New York Lung Cancers Symposium®

November 15, 2025

Register Now!

PER® Liver Cancer Tumor Board: How Do Evolving Data for Immune-Based Strategies in Resectable and Unresectable HCC Impact Multidisciplinary Patient Management Today… and Tomorrow?

View More

Community Practice Connections™: 6th Annual Precision Medicine Symposium – An Illustrated Tumor Board

View More

Advances In™: Taking R/R B-Cell ALL Management to the Next Level With New CAR T Approval

View More

Navigating Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer – Enhancing Diagnosis, Sequencing Therapy, and Contextualizing Novel Advances

View More

Cases & Conversations™: Integrating Novel Approaches to Treatment in First-line ALK+ mNSCLC – Enhancing Patient Outcomes with Real World Multidisciplinary Strategies

View More

Burst CME™: Implementing Appropriate Recognition and Diagnosis of Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

View More

Burst CME™: Understanding Novel Advances in LGSOC—A Focus on New Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Trials

View More

Burst CME™: Stratifying Therapy Sequencing for LGSOC and Evaluating the Unmet Needs of the Standard of Care

View More

Burst CME™: How is the Newly Approved CAR T-Cell Therapy Impacting R/R B-Cell ALL Management?

View More

Community Practice Connections™: Case Discussions in TNBC… Navigating the Latest Advances and Impact of Disparities in Care

View More

Epithelioid Sarcoma: Applying Clinical Updates to Real Patient Cases

View More

Collaborating Across the Continuum®: Identifying and Treating Epithelioid Sarcoma

View More

More News


Site Logo

Association Between the Rates of Synchronous and Metachronous Metastases: Analysis of SEER Data

June 1st 2007

Patients with cancer are usually staged based on the presence of detectable regional and/or distant disease. However, staging is inexact and cM0 patients may have microscopic metastases (cM0pM1) that later cause relapse and death. Since the clinical tools used to stage patients are fairly similar for different tumors, the ratio of the rates of metachronous to synchronous metastases should be similar for different tumors (hypothesis #1). Improvements in diagnostic tools should have caused the ratio of metachronous-to-synchronous metastases to have decreased over time (hypothesis #2). Finally, the fraction of patients with either metachronous or synchronous metastases should have declined over time due to increased screening and earlier diagnoses (hypothesis #3). To test these hypotheses, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 1973-1998 were analyzed for 19 solid tumors. A linear relationship was seen between the rates of metachronous and synchronous metastases, with modestly strong correlation coefficients, consistent with hypothesis #1. Over time, changes in staging methods have not significantly altered the ratio of metachronous/synchronous metastases, contrary to hypothesis #2. Also over time, a decrease in the number of patients with metastases was found, consistent with hypothesis #3. Therefore, the rate of anticipated metachronous metastases can be estimated from the rate of clinically evident metastases at presentation. Changes in screening/staging of disease over time may have reduced the overall fraction of patients with metastases.