Ovarian Cancer

>

Latest News

Among 35 patients with ovarian cancer treated with an antibody-based combination, the overall response rate was 23%, with a clinical benefit rate of 31%.
Botensilimab/Balstilimab Exhibits Meaningful Activity in Ovarian Cancer

December 24th 2025

Among 35 patients with ovarian cancer treated with an antibody-based combination, the overall response rate was 23%, with a clinical benefit rate of 31%.

Pooled analysis data from the phase 1 JSKN003-101 and phase 1/2 JSKN003-102 trials support the regulatory decision.
JSKN003 Earns FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for HER2-Expressing PROC

December 22nd 2025

Fuzuloparib monotherapy and as a combination with apatinib improved PFS as maintenance therapy in patients with ovarian cancer harboring BRCA1/2 mutations.
Fuzuloparib Maintenance Therapies Improve PFS in Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer

December 17th 2025

Although both immune priming strategies numerically improved ORR and PFS vs olaparib monotherapy, the study was not powered for comparisons between arms.
Immune Priming Strategies Numerically Improve PFS in Ovarian Cancer

November 24th 2025

The median PFS for patients with ovarian cancer who received niraparib maintenance in the real-world setting was 25.7 months.
Real-World Niraparib Efficacy Similar to Phase 3 Data in Ovarian Cancer

November 18th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

Association Between the Rates of Synchronous and Metachronous Metastases: Analysis of SEER Data

June 1st 2007

Patients with cancer are usually staged based on the presence of detectable regional and/or distant disease. However, staging is inexact and cM0 patients may have microscopic metastases (cM0pM1) that later cause relapse and death. Since the clinical tools used to stage patients are fairly similar for different tumors, the ratio of the rates of metachronous to synchronous metastases should be similar for different tumors (hypothesis #1). Improvements in diagnostic tools should have caused the ratio of metachronous-to-synchronous metastases to have decreased over time (hypothesis #2). Finally, the fraction of patients with either metachronous or synchronous metastases should have declined over time due to increased screening and earlier diagnoses (hypothesis #3). To test these hypotheses, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 1973-1998 were analyzed for 19 solid tumors. A linear relationship was seen between the rates of metachronous and synchronous metastases, with modestly strong correlation coefficients, consistent with hypothesis #1. Over time, changes in staging methods have not significantly altered the ratio of metachronous/synchronous metastases, contrary to hypothesis #2. Also over time, a decrease in the number of patients with metastases was found, consistent with hypothesis #3. Therefore, the rate of anticipated metachronous metastases can be estimated from the rate of clinically evident metastases at presentation. Changes in screening/staging of disease over time may have reduced the overall fraction of patients with metastases.