Panelists discuss how the INDIGO trial's compelling results led to early FDA approval of vorasidenib for progressive IDH-mutant gliomas, and how they counsel patients on sequencing IDH inhibitors vs traditional radiation and chemotherapy while considering long-term quality of life implications.
Content above is prompted by the following:
The INDIGO trial represents a landmark randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating vorasidenib (an IDH inhibitor) vs placebo in patients with progressive or persistent WHO grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas. The study was designed with planned interim analyses for potential FDA approval, and during one such analysis, the results proved so compelling that the FDA recommended early study termination. The dramatic improvement in progression-free survival and time to next treatment intervention led to full FDA approval in August 2024, marking a significant milestone in glioma treatment.
The trial's success demonstrates the efficacy of targeted molecular therapy in IDH-mutant gliomas, offering a new treatment paradigm that addresses the infiltrative nature of these tumors. Unlike traditional radiation and chemotherapy, IDH inhibitors can theoretically reach microscopic disease throughout the brain via systemic circulation. The favorable safety profile of vorasidenib contrasts sharply with the potential short and long-term toxicities associated with radiation and chemotherapy, making it an attractive option for the typically young patient population.
Treatment sequencing discussions now include IDH inhibitors as a potential first-line option, though overall survival data remain immature given the long natural history of these tumors. Clinicians must balance patient preferences between daily oral therapy for extended periods vs intensive but time-limited radiation/chemotherapy regimens. The availability of IDH inhibitors allows for deferral of more toxic treatments while maintaining disease control, though careful counseling ensures patients understand that radiation and chemotherapy remain effective options for future use. This sequential approach maximizes treatment options while prioritizing quality of life in this young patient population with excellent long-term prognosis.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.