How Are Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) Diagnosed and Staged?

Opinion
Video

A nurse practitioner and two hematologic oncologists outline diagnosis and staging practices for patients with multiple myeloma.

This is a video synopsis/summary of a Between the Lines series featuring Donna Catamero, ANP-BC, OCN, CCRC; Cesar Rodriguez, MD; and Saad Usmani, MD, MBA, FACP.

Rodriguez discusses how multiple myeloma (MM) is diagnosed and staged. Diagnosis involves blood work such as complete blood count to check hemoglobin, comprehensive metabolic panel to assess renal function and calcium level, serum protein electrophoresis to identify abnormal immunoglobulins (M protein), immunofixation electrophoresis, and serum free light chains to evaluate M protein fragments. These data indicate whether abnormal proteins from myeloma cells are present and their type, quantity, and integrity. Additional blood tests such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), β2 microglobulin, and albumin facilitate staging. Urine studies check for free light chains or Bence-Jones proteins. Imaging such as PET-CT identifies lytic bone lesions and extramedullary plasmacytomas. Alternative imaging includes low-dose contrast-enhanced CT or whole-body MRI. Bone marrow biopsy results from the iliac crest or from plasmacytomas characterize disease, and staging uses cytogenetics, albumin, β2 microglobulin, and LDH.

Video synopsis is AI generated and reviewed by CancerNetwork® editorial staff.

Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
Related Content