Second-Line Paclitaxel Effective in Advanced NSCLC

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 10
Volume 9
Issue 10

TOKYO-Weekly paclitaxel (Tax-ol) and carboplatin (Paraplatin) is an effective and well-tolerated second-line therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed first-line therapy with the same agents, Mark A. Socinski, MD, said at the 9th World Conference on Lung Cancer. Dr. Socinski is director of the Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

TOKYO—Weekly paclitaxel (Tax-ol) and carboplatin (Paraplatin) is an effective and well-tolerated second-line therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed first-line therapy with the same agents, Mark A. Socinski, MD, said at the 9th World Conference on Lung Cancer. Dr. Socinski is director of the Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

The 55 patients were first treated on a phase III trial designed to address the optimal duration of first-line paclitaxel/carboplatin. They were then split into three groups: (1) patients with refractory NSCLC who progressed after two cycles of first-line therapy, (2) patients who received four cycles of first-line therapy and were then observed until progression, and (3) patients who received continuous chemotherapy until progression.

Median survival from the start of second-line therapy was 6.6 months for all patients, with 1-year survival of 24%, Dr. Socinski said. Overall survival was affected by initial disease sensitivity with median survival for groups 1, 2, and 3 of 5.2, 10.0, and 5.3 months, respectively. The overall response rate to second-line therapy was 9%. There was no significant decrease in quality of life over the first 5 weeks of second-line therapy.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.