Authors


Mark Agulnik, MD

Latest:

Head and Neck Cancer: Changing Epidemiology and Public Health Implications

Characterizing the epidemiology of head and neck cancers is challenging and has received limited attention in the medical literature. Traditionally, 80%–90% of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) have been attributed to tobacco and alcohol use, but with growing public awareness and tobacco control efforts over the past few decades, there has been a downward trend in smoking prevalence in the US. There is also emerging evidence that human papillomavirus (HPV) is responsible for inconsistencies in HNSCC trends, with oncogenic HPV DNA found in approximately half of oropharyngeal cancers and in a high proportion of oropharyngeal cancers in nonsmokers and nondrinkers. The risk to HNSCC epidemiology is that whatever gains continue to be made in tobacco control may become lost in the increasing numbers of oropharyngeal cancers due to HPV. The purpose of this review is to explore the changing epidemiology of HNSCC, focusing on how it has been shaped by health policy and advocacy interventions and how it will continue to have public health implications in the future, particularly in considering preventive strategies against HPV. Given that the majority of HNSCCs are the result of exposure to preventable public health risks, more focus should be given to this area.


Mark Bouzyk, PhD

Latest:

Predicting Endocrine Responsiveness: Novel Biomarkers on the Horizon

Historically, breast tumor classification and therapeutic decisions have relied on immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques for characterizing biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), as described in the review by Ma and colleagues. However, these markers have been found to be inadequate for fully predicting a patient’s response to a given breast cancer treatment such as endocrine therapy.


Mark Crowther, MD

Latest:

Commentary (Crowther/Kelton): Thromboembolic Complications of Malignancy

Advances in cancer treatmentover the past 50 years havecured or prolonged the life expectancyof many patients with cancer.These advances have accelerated overthe past 2 decades. Increasingly, physicianswho manage patients with cancerare turning their attention to the managementof the complications of malignancy,since these complications areoften avoidable, can shorten life spans,and can reduce quality of life.


Mark D. Anderson, MD

Latest:

Treatment Recommendations for Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas That Are Codeleted

Although important questions still remain regarding chemotherapy choice, sequence, and dosing, the answers to which will require additional large phase III trials, radiotherapy alone is no longer appropriate therapy for 1p/19q codeleted anaplastic oligodendrogliomas.


Mark D. Delacure, MD

Latest:

Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Risk Group Assignment and Management Controversies

In this review, we provide a framework for clinical decision-making in the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. The clinical discussion and treatment recommendations are relevant to an adult population (more than 16


Mark D. Demario, MD

Latest:

Rationale for Phase I Study of UFT Plus Leucovorin and Oral JM-216

Both cisplatin (Platinol) and fluorouracil (5-FU) have demonstrated single-agent clinical efficacy in a variety of solid neoplasms. The combination of these agents has revealed synergistic cytotoxicity in models in vitro and in vivo, which may explain the clinical effectiveness of 5-FU-cisplatin regimens. UFT (tegafur and uracil) and bis-aceto-ammine-dichloro-cyclohexyl-amine platinum (IV) (JM-216) are novel oral analogues of 5-FU and cisplatin, respectively. In preclinical models, JM-216 has demonstrated equivalent cytotoxicity to cisplatin, while phase I trials suggest its dose-limiting toxicity is myelosuppression. In contrast to cisplatin, JM-216 has not demonstrated significant neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity. UFT has been used extensively in Japan, where phase II data suggest disease response rates similar to single-agent 5-FU in colorectal, gastric, and breast carcinomas. Combination studies of prolonged administration UFT and single-dose cisplatin have shown efficacy, but also significant hematologic toxicity. We propose a phase I study of UFT and JM-216 administered daily over 14 consecutive days with leucovorin (90 mg/d). Ease of administration and continuous drug exposure are potential advantages of this regimen. Several disease specific investigations may be warranted given demonstrated feasibility in this phase I study.[ONCOLOGY 11(Suppl 10):26-29, 1997]


Mark D. Pegram, MD

Latest:

Mark Pegram, MD, Discusses Major Takeaways From the IDEAL Trial in HR+ Breast Cancer

Mark Pegram, MD, spoke the most important data from the IDEAL trial he believes his colleagues should take away.


Mark E. Ginsburg, MD

Latest:

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nonsurgical Treatment for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Good Performance Status/Definitive Intent

The treatment of inoperable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a challenge due to high rates of distant metastasis, local recurrence, and toxicity associated with definitive therapy.


Mark E. Robson, MD

Latest:

Screening for Ovarian Cancer: What We Know, What We Need to Know

The majority of women with ovarian cancer present with advanced-stage disease. Women with early-stage ovarian cancer have a much better chance of achieving a cure than do women with late-stage disease. This


Mark E. Shaves, MD

Latest:

Contemporary Management of Prostate Cancer With Lethal Potential

Screening for prostate cancer by determining serum prostate-specificantigen (PSA) levels has resulted in a stage migration such thatpatients with high-risk disease are more likely to be candidates for curativelocal therapy. By combining serum PSA, clinical stage, and biopsyinformation-both Gleason score and volume of tumor in the biopsycores-specimen pathologic stage and patient biochemical disease-freesurvival can be estimated. This information can help patients and cliniciansunderstand the severity of disease and the need for multimodaltherapy, often in the context of a clinical trial. While the mainstays oftreatment for local disease control are radical prostatectomy and radiationtherapy, systemic therapy must be considered as well. A randomizedtrial has shown a survival benefit for radical prostatectomy inpatients with positive lymph nodes who undergo immediate adjuvantandrogen deprivation. Clinical trials are needed to clarify whether adjuvantradiation therapy after surgery confers a survival benefit. PSAis a sensitive marker for follow-up after local treatment and has proventhat conventional external-beam irradiation alone is inadequate treatmentfor high-risk disease. Fortunately, the technology of radiationdelivery has been dramatically improved with tools such as three-dimensionalconformal radiation, intensity-modulated radiation therapy,and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The further contributions of pelvicirradiation and neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant androgen deprivationtherapy have been defined in clinical trials. Future managementof high-risk prostate cancer may be expanded by clinical trialsevaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy in combinationwith androgen deprivation.


Mark Fairweather, MD

Latest:

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

The aim of this review is to discuss current neoadjuvant treatment options for soft-tissue sarcomas.


Mark Fuerst

Latest:

Many TNBC Patients Unnecessarily Opt for Mastectomy

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases eligibility for breast-conserving therapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients, yet many still opt for mastectomy.



Mark Graham, MD

Latest:

New Strategies for Managing Metastatic Breast Cancer

Drs. Olin and Muss provide an excellent review of current state-of-the-art treatments and treatment strategies for patients with metastatic breast cancer. They explore a number of the existing questions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and emphasize the need for ongoing clinical trials.


Mark H. Meissner, MD

Latest:

Commentary (Meissner): Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Cancer Patients

The diagnosis of venous thromboembolismon the basis ofclinical signs and symptoms isnotoriously inaccurate and, therefore,mandates confirmatory diagnostictesting. Unfortunately, all diagnostictests for deep venous thrombosis(DVT) and pulmonary embolismhave clinical or practical limitations.Contrast venography and pulmonaryarteriography are usually regarded asthe reference standards for the diagnosisof DVT and pulmonary embolism,respectively. However, evencontrast venography may be impossibleto perform in 9% to 14% ofpatients, may fail to visualize 10% to30% of venous segments, and maybe associated with postvenographythrombosis in up to 8% of patients.[1]


Mark Hagland

Latest:

Expert panel reviews strategies for nutrition and cancer care

CHICAGO-Biology and biography were the buzzwords at a panel convened on cancer nutrition at the 2009 Nutrition and Health Conference: State of the Science and Clinical Applications. Panel members offered a primer on the various nutrition strategies that are available to cancer patients.


Mark Hill, MD

Latest:

UFT/Leucovorin Plus Irinotecan in Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

UFT (with leucovorin) and irinotecan both have single-agent activity in colorectal cancer, with non–cross-resistant mechanisms of action. Combining these drugs would be anticipated to increase response rates while maintaining the advantages of a regimen based on an orally administered fluoropyrimidine.


Mark Hurwitz, MD

Latest:

Urothelial and Kidney Cancers

This management guide covers the treatment of urothelial cancers (carcinomas of the bladder, ureters, and renal pelvis) and kidney cancers (renal tumors).


Mark J. Krasna, MD

Latest:

Multimodality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer

Recent developments in the epidemiology, staging, and treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers have led to significant changes in the way these malignancies are managed. Although a relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal cancer has been demonstrated, antireflux surgery has been shown to have no preventive effect with regard to the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The newly modified staging system of the World Esophageal Cancer Consortium has helped define the optimal number of lymph nodes to dissect during an esophagectomy. Incorporating modern techniques, such as esophageal ultrasound, fine needle aspiration, and positron emission tomography, can improve the prognostic value of staging. Use of higher-volume centers and higher-volume surgeons for the performance of procedures in upper gastrointestinal cancers is associated with better outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation using a wide variety of chemotherapy regimens appears to have become the new standard of care for stage II and III esophageal cancer.


Mark J. Ratain, MD

Latest:

Outline of Oncology Therapeutics

Outline of Oncology Therapeutics is a well-written, concise, and up-to-date book providing detailed descriptions of a variety of medications and issues important to the overall care and treatment of patients with cancer. Oncology practice today


Mark Jacobs, PharmD

Latest:

Pharmacology of Liposomal Daunorubicin and Its Use in Kaposi's Sarcoma

In the early 1980s, we first began to see cases of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) in patients with the lymphadenopathy now known to be associated with infection by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). During that period, we


Mark K. Buyyounouski, MD, MS

Latest:

Testicular Cancer

This testicular cancer management guide covers the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of germ-cell tumors and seminoma.


Mark K. Ferguson, MD

Latest:

Concomitant Cisplatin, Vinorelbine, and Radiation in Advanced Chest Malignancies

Newer chemotherapy drugs have shown encouraging activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Based on these improved outcomes, as well as the high rate of distant relapse in patients with locally advanced disease, several recent studies have evaluated the use of systemic therapy in patients with earlier-stage disease.


Mark L. Fuerst

Latest:

ASCO, NCCN Advise on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor AEs

ASCO and NCCN have released guidelines on assessment and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor–related side effects.


Mark Lander, MD, FRCPC

Latest:

Current Management of Depression in Cancer Patients

Depression is a common but treatable condition among cancer patients. Screening for depression can be done simply and effectively, and a variety of practical treatment strategies are available. Numerous factors should be


Mark Levis, MD

Latest:

Developing Novel Treatments Using the AML Genome

In this interview we discuss acute myeloid leukemia therapy approaches and new molecular targets based on genetic analyses of the disease with a leukemia expert.


Mark Litzow, MD

Latest:

Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: More Drugs, More Lives Saved, New Challenges

The development of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeted against the causative Bcr-Abl protein in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), has resulted in hematologic and cytogenetic remissions in all phases of CML. Following imatinib treatment, more than 90% of patients obtain complete hematologic response, and 70% to 80% achieve a complete cytogenetic response. With 5 years of follow-up, the data are very encouraging, exhibiting a major change in the natural history of the disease. The understanding of at least some of the mechanisms of resistance to imatinib has led to a rapid development of new agents that may overcome this resistance. Combination strategies are currently being investigated in preliminary clinical studies and may prove to be useful. Overall, there are an increasing number of treatment options now available for patients with CML.


Mark M. Ngo, MD

Latest:

The Hope of Integrated Palliative Care in Oncology Private Practice

The review by Alesi et al attempts to answer an important question in real clinical practice: Is it better to refer patients directly to hospice when aggressive treatments have stopped working or rather to integrate palliative care (PC) earlier in the course of a patient’s disease?


Mark M. Schubert, DDS, MSD

Latest:

Oropharyngeal Mucositis in Cancer Therapy

Oropharyngeal mucositis is a common and treatment-limiting sideeffect of cancer therapy. Severe oral mucositis can lead to the need tointerrupt or discontinue cancer therapy and thus may have an impacton cure of the primary disease. Mucositis may also increase the risk oflocal and systemic infection and significantly affects quality of life andcost of care. Current care of patients with mucositis is essentially palliativeand includes appropriate oral hygiene, nonirritating diet andoral care products, topical palliative mouth rinses, topical anesthetics,and opioid analgesics. Systemic analgesics are the mainstay of painmanagement. Topical approaches to pain management are under investigation.The literature supports use of benzydamine for prophylaxisof mucositis caused by conventional fractionationated head andneck radiotherapy, and cryotherapy for short–half-life stomatoxic chemotherapy,such as bolus fluorouracil. Continuing studies are investigatingthe potential use of biologic response modifiers and growth factors,including topical and systemic delivery of epithelial growth factorsand agents. Progress in the prevention and management of mucositiswill improve quality of life, reduce cost of care, and facilitate completionof more intensive cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy protocols. Inaddition, improved management of mucositis may allow implementationof cancer treatment protocols that are currently excessively mucotoxicbut may produce higher cure rates. Continuing research related to thepathogenesis and management of mucositis will undoubtedly lead to thedevelopment of potential interventions and improved patient care.


Mark M. Zalupski, MD

Latest:

Chemotherapy for Resectable and Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

This article will review the pertinent data on the use of chemotherapy for all stages of pancreatic cancer. For patients with metastatic disease, fluorouracil (5-FU) was the standard of care for several decades until a single