(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Temporal lobe radionecrosis is a potential complication of high-dose radiation therapy for skull base tumors. The risk of radionecrosis increases with absolute doses greater than 60 Gy, but little data are available regarding potential partial volume effects when higher-dose conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is employed.

S015 Figure

Okechukwu R. Linton, MD, MBA, Mark W. McDonald, MD; Indiana University Health Proton Therapy Center, Indiana University School of Medicine

Background and Purpose: Temporal lobe radionecrosis is a potential complication of high-dose radiation therapy for skull base tumors. The risk of radionecrosis increases with absolute doses greater than 60 Gy, but little data are available regarding potential partial volume effects when higher-dose conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is employed.

Materials and Methods: Patients who were previously treated with fractionated proton therapy for skull base chordoma, chondrosarcoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, or paranasal sinus tumors between 2005 and 2012 were analyzed, provided there was a minimum of 6 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up after treatment. The patient factors that were collected were gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status. Treatment factors included chemotherapy utilization, whether patients’ temporal lobes had been prospectively contoured or retrospectively contoured for this review, and the absolute dose and absolute volume data for both the right and left temporal lobes, considered separately. Generalized estimating equations were used to test for the association between each patient and treatment factor and radiation necrosis, adjusting for within-subject correlation due to repeated measures. The risk of temporal lobe radionecrosis as a function of the absolute volume of a single temporal lobe irradiated was modeled using the median effective concentration (EC50) equation. The absolute volume of a temporal lobe receiving 10–70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 10-Gy (RBE) increments was analyzed (aV10, aV20, etc).

Results: Sixty-six patients and 131 temporal lobes were included in the analysis. One patient received radiation dose to only one temporal lobe due to a well-lateralized tumor. The median prescribed dose was 75.6 Gy (RBE) (range: 62–79.2 Gy [RBE]) in 1.8–2-Gy (RBE) fractions. Seven patients (11%) received concomitant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time after completion of radiation therapy was 27 months. Thirteen temporal lobes were observed to develop radionecrosis in 10 patients at a median time of 20 months after radiation. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of the risk of any-grade temporal lobe radionecrosis in this cohort was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%–20%). In the multivariable analysis, only radiation dose-volume relationships were associated with development of radionecrosis. In the EC50 model, all dose levels from 10 to 70 Gy (RBE) were highly correlated with radionecrosis, with a 15% 2-year risk of any-grade temporal lobe radionecrosis when the absolute volume of a temporal lobe receiving 30 Gy (RBE) (aV30) exceeded 16.3 cm3, aV40 >13 cm3, aV50 > 8.8 cm3, or aV60 > 5.2 cm3.

Conclusions: Dose-volume parameters are highly correlated with the risk of developing temporal lobe radionecrosis. In the setting of high-dose skull base radiotherapy, larger volumes exposed to lower doses and smaller volumes exposed to higher doses are both highly correlated with the risk of developing temporal lobe radionecrosis. Treatment planning goals should include reduction in both integral and maximal dose to the temporal lobes. The EC50 model provides suggested dose-volume temporal lobe constraints for conventionally fractionated high-dose skull base radiotherapy.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content