Leukemia

Latest News

The KOMET-001 trial meets its primary end point of CR/CRh rate among patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.
Ziftomenib Shows MRD-Negative Responses in Pretreated NPM1+ AML

June 3rd 2025

The KOMET-001 trial meets its primary end point of CR/CRh rate among patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.

The FDA assigned a Prescription Drug User Fee Act date of November 30, 2025, for ziftomenib in NPM1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.
Ziftomenib Earns FDA Priority Review for R/R NPM1-Mutant AML

June 3rd 2025

With longer-term follow-up, investigators observed no new safety signals for zanubrutinib in patients with CLL or SLL harboring 17p deletions.
Zanubrutinib Shows Sustained Efficacy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

May 31st 2025

The positive CHMP opinion is based on results from the phase 1b/2 FELIX trial evaluating obe-cel in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL.
Obe-Cel Receives Positive CHMP Opinion for R/R B-Cell ALL

May 23rd 2025

3 Things You Should Know About Advances in CLL Management
3 Things You Should Know About Advances in CLL Management

May 20th 2025

More News


Site Logo

New Therapeutic Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.


Site Logo

What Is the Optimal Initial Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.