Leukemia

Latest News

A 13-week Good Laboratory Practice toxicity study demonstrated that UB-VV111 was well-tolerated in CD34-humanized mice.
FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to UB-VV111 in Select B-Cell Malignancies

October 1st 2025

A phase 1 trial is evaluating UB-VV111 with and without rapamycin as treatment for patients with CLL and LBCL who received at least 2 prior therapies.

An indirect comparison supports continuous therapy with zanubrutinib as a valuable treatment option in treatment-naïve CLL or SLL.
Indirect Comparison Favors Zanubrutinib vs Venetoclax Combo in CLL/SLL

September 26th 2025

Data from KOMET-001 support ziftomenib as a new potential option for patients with relapsed/refractory NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.
Ziftomenib Shows Significant Benefit in Relapsed/Refractory NPM1+ AML

September 26th 2025

Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML
Evaluating Single-Agent Ziftomenib’s Performance in NPM1+ R/R AML

September 11th 2025

The overall safety profile of pirtobrutinib was consistent with previously reported trials across various CLL and SLL settings.
Pirtobrutinib Improves PFS in Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL Without 17p Deletions

September 8th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

New Therapeutic Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.


Site Logo

What Is the Optimal Initial Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.