Leukemia

Latest News

Zanubrutinib led to a 72% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death vs bendamustine/rituximab in this CLL/SLL population.
Zanubrutinib Exhibits Superior Long-Term Efficacy in First-Line CLL/SLL

December 10th 2025

Zanubrutinib led to a 72% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death vs bendamustine/rituximab in this CLL/SLL population.

Data from the SEQUOIA trial support the use of zanubrutinib/venetoclax in CLL or SLL regardless of del(17p)/TP53 mutation or IGHV mutational status.
Zanubrutinib Regimen Sustains PFS Benefit Across CLL/SLL Mutation Statuses

December 9th 2025

Data from the BRUIN-CLL-313 study may support pirtobrutinib as a new potential standard of care for those with untreated CLL or SLL.
Pirtobrutinib Improves PFS in Treatment-Naive CLL/SLL

December 9th 2025

Novel Treatment Displays Tolerability in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell ALL
Novel Treatment Displays Tolerability in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell ALL

December 9th 2025

Among patients with NPM1-mutated and KMT2A-rearranged disease, respectively, the ORR was 65% and 41% in the phase 1 KOMET-007 trial.
Ziftomenib Combo Exhibits Tolerability/Early Activity in NPM1/KMT2A+ AML

December 8th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

New Therapeutic Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.


Site Logo

What Is the Optimal Initial Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

December 1st 2007

For decades, initial therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) consisted of alkylators such as chlorambucil (Leukeran). The introduction of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (Rituxan) markedly changed the initial therapy of CLL, particularly in the United States. Fludarabine and combination regimens such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) have achieved higher complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL, but long-term overall survival has not improved, due to concurrent improvement in salvage therapy of relapsed CLL patients. Upfront chemoimmunotherapy regimens such as fludarabine/rituximab (FR) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) have similarly improved CR rates and PFS in previously untreated CLL patients, but it is unclear whether overall survival is improved. Advances in cytogenetic analysis and other biologic prognostic factors have greatly enhanced clinicians' ability to risk-stratify newly diagnosed CLL patients, and knowledge of such prognostic factors is necessary to properly interpret results of clinical treatment studies. The choice of initial therapy for an individual patient should depend upon the patient's age and medical condition, cytogenetic and other prognostic factors, and whether the goal of therapy is maximization of CR and PFS or palliation of symptoms with minimal toxicity.