Latest News

Twice-Daily Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy Effective at 60 Gy in SCLC
Twice-Daily Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy Effective at 60 Gy in SCLC

June 6th 2025

A phase 2 trial demonstrated a median overall survival of 43.5 months at 60 Gy compared with 22.5 months at 45 Gy in patients with limited-stage SCLC.

THIO Plus Cemiplimab Associated with Prolonged OS in ICI-Resistant NSCLC
THIO Plus Cemiplimab Associated with Prolonged OS in ICI-Resistant NSCLC

June 5th 2025

Six or More Cycles of Chemo Prolong Survival With Atezolizumab in ES-SCLC
Six or More Cycles of Chemo Prolong Survival With Atezolizumab in ES-SCLC

June 4th 2025

Benmelstobart With/Without Anlotinib Is Effective Consolidation Therapy in NSCLC
Benmelstobart With/Without Anlotinib Is Effective Consolidation Therapy in NSCLC

June 3rd 2025

Neoadjuvant Alectinib Effective, Tolerable in Late-Stage ALK-Positive NSCLC
Neoadjuvant Alectinib Effective, Tolerable in Late-Stage ALK-Positive NSCLC

June 2nd 2025

More News


Site Logo

First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

November 1st 2005

With best supportive care alone, patients with metastatic non–smallcelllung cancer (NSCLC) have a median survival of 4 to 5 months anda 1-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Trials carried out in the1980s and 1990s comparing chemotherapy to best supportive care reportedvariable efficacy results; however, a pivotal meta-analysis of thesedata indicated that cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided a survivalbenefit in advanced NSCLC. In the past decade newer agents such asgemcitabine (Gemzar), vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel (Taxotere)have all demonstrated activity in NSCLC as single agents; consequentlythese agents have been combined with cisplatin or carboplatin. Randomizedphase III trials comparing these “newer” platin-based doubletshave failed to identify an optimal platinum-based doublet therapyregimen. Though it is clear that chemotherapy is an appropriate treatmentfor many patients with lung cancer, there a sense in which the useof traditional chemotherapeutic agents has reached a therapeutic plateau.Increased understanding of cancer biology has revealed numerouspotential therapeutic strategies, including targeting the epidermalgrowth factor receptor, protein kinase C, rexinoid receptors, and theangiogenesis pathway. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studyE4599 comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with/without bevacizumab isthe first phase III randomized trial to show a survival advantage withthe addition of a molecularly targeted agent to chemotherapy in thechemotherapy-naive patient population. Future studies will involve theevaluation of additional targeted agents plus chemotherapy as well aslooking at combinations of these targeted agents alone or with chemotherapy.


Site Logo

Radiofrequency Ablation in Lung Cancer: Promising Results in Safety and Efficacy

October 1st 2005

Only about 15% of patients diagnosed with lung carcinoma eachyear are surgical candidates, either due to advanced disease orcomorbidities. The past decade has seen the emergence of minimallyinvasive therapies using thermal energy sources: radiofrequency,cryoablation, focused ultrasound, laser, and microwave; radiofrequencyablation (RFA) is the best developed of these. Radiofrequency ablationis safe and technically highly successful in terms of initial ablation.Long-term local control or complete necrosis rates drop considerablywhen tumors are larger than 3 cm, although repeat ablations can beperformed. Patients with lung metastases tend to fare better with RFlung ablation than those with primary lung carcinoma in terms of localcontrol, but it is unclear if this is related to smaller tumor size at time oftreatment, lesion size uniformity, and sphericity with lung metastases,or to differences in patterns of pathologic spread of disease. The effectsof RFA on quality of life, particularly dyspnea and pain, as well aslong-term outcome studies are generally lacking. Even so, the resultsregarding RF lung ablation are comparable to other therapies currentlyavailable, particularly for the conventionally unresectable or high-risklung cancer population. With refinements in technology, patient selection,clinical applications, and methods of follow-up, RFA will continueto flourish as a potentially viable stand-alone or complementarytherapy for both primary and secondary lung malignancies in standardand high-risk populations.