Panelists discuss how to manage borderline transaminase elevations in a patient benefiting from voracidinib therapy, balancing the risk of mild liver toxicity against continued disease control while investigating potential contributing factors.
Content above is prompted by the following:
The second case presents a 45-year-old teacher with an IDH-mutant astrocytoma who developed progressive FLAIR signal changes 18 months after initial resection and was started on voracidinib. After 6 months of treatment, the patient developed ALT and AST elevations approximately 3 times the upper limit of normal, representing a borderline grade 1-2 toxicity. This scenario illustrates the common clinical challenge of managing mild hepatotoxicity in patients who are benefiting from IDH inhibitor therapy.
The expert panel recommends a cautious approach, suggesting temporary drug discontinuation with weekly monitoring until liver enzymes return to grade 1 or baseline levels. Given the relatively aggressive disease progression in this case (significant regrowth within 18 months), the oncologists emphasize avoiding dose reductions, when possible, to maintain therapeutic benefit. They note that this patient's significant disease burden and bilateral involvement necessitate maximizing the therapeutic dose of voracidinib for optimal disease control.
The experts emphasize the importance of balancing mild hepatotoxicity against clear evidence of disease progression and treatment response. Clinical experience suggests that many patients experience transient liver enzyme elevations that spontaneously resolve over several months, even while continuing therapy. The panel stresses investigating other potential causes of hepatotoxicity, including concurrent medications, supplements, and lifestyle factors such as alcohol and acetaminophen use. This comprehensive approach helps distinguish drug-related hepatotoxicity from other causes, enabling more informed treatment decisions and potentially avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuation.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.