Panelists discuss how voracidinib shows superior brain penetration compared to other IDH inhibitors and explore exciting combination approaches with immunotherapy and vaccines that target the immunosuppressive effects of 2-HG in the tumor microenvironment.
Content above is prompted by the following:
Recent clinical trial data demonstrates that voracidinib achieves superior brain penetration compared to ivosidenib, with higher drug concentrations in tumor tissue and more effective 2-HG inhibition. The perioperative study comparing these IDH inhibitors head-to-head showed that voracidinib not only reaches therapeutic concentrations in the brain but also provides better long-term outcomes, with twice as many patients remaining on voracidinib compared to ivosidenib at extended follow-up periods. This enhanced brain penetration is particularly crucial for incompletely resected tumors where significant infiltrative disease remains.
The 2-HG metabolite produced by IDH-mutant tumors creates a profoundly immunosuppressive microenvironment by inhibiting T-cell function and cytotoxicity. Researchers are exploring combination strategies that use IDH inhibitors not only to target tumor cells directly but also to modulate the immune microenvironment. By blocking 2-HG production, IDH inhibitors may enhance the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines, potentially overcoming the historical resistance of gliomas to immunotherapy approaches.
Preclinical studies demonstrate promising results for cancer vaccine approaches combined with IDH inhibitor therapy. The strategy involves using vaccines to drive T cells into the tumor microenvironment while simultaneously reducing 2-HG levels through IDH inhibition, creating a more favorable environment for antitumor immune responses. However, researchers acknowledge that gliomas have multiple redundant mechanisms for immune evasion, necessitating sophisticated combinatorial approaches to overcome the remarkably immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment characteristic of malignant gliomas.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.