Panelists discuss how to implement hepatotoxicity monitoring protocols, counsel patients about avoiding hepatotoxic substances, and manage the infrequent but manageable liver enzyme elevations that typically occur within the first 6 months of treatment.
Content above is prompted by the following:
IDH inhibitors, particularly voracidinib, require careful monitoring for hepatotoxicity, though this adverse event occurs in only a small percentage of patients. The standard monitoring protocol includes baseline liver function tests (LFTs), followed by testing every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, then monthly for up to 2 years. However, most practitioners modify this schedule based on individual patient risk factors and clinical judgment, often extending intervals to every 2 to 3 months after the initial high-risk period.
When hepatotoxicity occurs, it typically manifests within the first 6 months of treatment and is generally manageable through dose holds and adjustments. Expert oncologists emphasize the importance of investigating other potential causes of elevated liver enzymes, including concurrent medications, supplements (particularly green tea extract), alcohol use, and acetaminophen intake. The panel shares clinical experience showing that many LFT elevations are reversible and don't require permanent treatment discontinuation, allowing patients to continue benefiting from IDH inhibitor therapy.
Beyond hepatotoxicity, IDH inhibitors can cause musculoskeletal symptoms including arthralgias and myalgias in a small subset of patients, though these are typically mild and manageable. Gastrointestinal adverse effects such as heartburn and indigestion are also reported but generally well tolerated. The experts stress the importance of comprehensive patient education about potential adverse effects, drug interactions, and the need for regular monitoring, while reassuring patients that serious adverse events are uncommon and most adverse effects are reversible with appropriate management.
Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025
April 15th 2025Steven E. Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO discuses how Prolaris distinguishes itself from other genomic biomarker platforms by providing uniquely actionable clinical information that quantifies the absolute benefit of androgen deprivation therapy when added to radiation therapy, offering clinicians a more precise tool for personalizing prostate cancer treatment strategies.
Recap: Recent Advances in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
September 18th 2022Expert oncologists review key studies in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment landscape and discuss how evidence can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
CCR Scores and Beyond: Precision Strategies for Treatment Intensification in Prostate Cancer
April 15th 2025Alvaro Martinez, MD discusses how emerging genomic risk stratification tools such as the clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score are transforming personalized prostate cancer treatment by enabling more nuanced assessments of metastasis risk and treatment intensification strategies beyond traditional NCCN risk groupings.
Recap: Updates in Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases
July 16th 2022Sara A. Hurvitz, MD; Stefania Maraka, MD; and Ruta Rao, MD, discuss the evolving landscape of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer, highlighting recent clinical trials and the management of patients with brain metastases.
Recap: Emory Experts Review Treatment Strategies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
June 20th 2022A panel of experts from Emory University review several key data updates in multiple myeloma from recent meetings and discuss how the data can be applied to clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.