Skin Cancer & Melanoma

Latest News

The developer submitted their request in writing and anticipates a response from the FDA before the end of Q3 2025.
FDA Accepts Type C Meeting for Doxorubicin-MNA in Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin

August 22nd 2025

D-MNA achieved complete clinical clearance in 60% of patients, with no dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse effects observed in those with basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

It was reported that though the treatment did not demonstrate statistical significance, it did yield a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS.
Novel Cancer Vaccine Combo Therapy Numerically Improves PFS in Melanoma

August 12th 2025

At 4 years, about 20% of patients with advanced melanoma who received tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy were alive and responding to treatment.
TIL Therapy Provides Excitement Despite Room to Grow in Melanoma Care

August 5th 2025

Innovative oncolytic virus therapies transform advanced melanoma treatment, enhance patient outcomes, and overcome resistance to traditional immunotherapies.
3 Things You Should Know About Managing Advanced Melanoma With Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapies

July 30th 2025

Credit: Northwell Health
Singh to Advance Northwell’s Skin Cancer Program With Surgical Director Promotion

July 28th 2025

Latest CME Events & Activities

More News


Site Logo

Management of Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma

October 1st 2004

The results of treatment for metastatic melanoma remain disappointing.Single-agent chemotherapy produces response rates ranging from8% to 15%, and combination chemotherapy, from 10% to 30%. However,these responses are usually not durable. Immunotherapy, particularlyhigh-dose interleukin (IL)-2 (Proleukin), has also shown a lowresponse rate of approximately 15%, although it is often long-lasting.In fact, a small but finite cure rate of about 5% has been reported withhigh-dose IL-2. Phase II studies of the combination of cisplatin-basedchemotherapy with IL-2 and interferon-alfa, referred to as biochemotherapy,have shown overall response rates ranging from 40% to60%, with durable complete remissions in approximately 8% to 10% ofpatients. Although the results of the phase II single-institution studieswere encouraging, phase III multicenter studies have reported conflictingresults, which overall have been predominantly negative. Variousfactors probably explain these discrepancies including differentbiochemotherapy regimens, patient selection, and, most importantly,“physician selection.” Novel strategies are clearly needed, and the mostencouraging ones for the near future include high-dose IL-2 in combinationwith adoptive transfer of selected tumor-reactive T cells afternonmyeloablative regimens, BRAF inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy,and the combination of chemotherapeutic agents andbiochemotherapy with oblimersen sodium (Genasense).


Radiotherapy for Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: Rationale and Indications

Radiotherapy for Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: Rationale and Indications

January 1st 2004

The use of radiation as adjuvant therapy for patients with cutaneousmalignant melanoma has been hindered by the unsubstantiatedbelief that melanoma cells are radioresistant. An abundance of literaturehas now demonstrated that locoregional relapse of melanoma iscommon after surgery alone when certain clinicopathologic featuresare present. Features associated with a high risk of primary tumor recurrenceinclude desmoplastic subtype, positive microscopic margins,recurrent disease, and thick primary lesions with ulceration or satellitosis.Features associated with a high risk of nodal relapse include extracapsularextension, involvement of four or more lymph nodes, lymphnodes measuring at least 3 cm, cervical lymph node location, and recurrentdisease. Numerous studies support the efficacy of adjuvant irradiationin these clinical situations. Although data in the literatureremain sparse, evidence also indicates that elective irradiation is effectivein eradicating subclinical nodal metastases after removal of theprimary melanoma. Consequently, there may be an opportunity to integrateradiotherapy into the multimodality treatment of patients at highrisk of subclinical nodal disease, particularly those with an involvedsentinel lymph node. Such patients are known to have a low rate ofadditional lymph node involvement, and thus in this group, a shortcourse of radiotherapy may be an adequate substitute for regional lymphnode dissection. This will be the topic of future research.